2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.03.446868
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philympics 2021: Prophage Predictions Perplex Programs

Abstract: Most bacterial genomes contain integrated bacteriophages—prophages—in various states of decay. Many are active and able to excise from the genome and replicate, while others are cryptic prophages, remnants of their former selves. Over the last two decades, many computational tools have been developed to identify the prophage components of bacterial genomes, and it is a particularly active area for the application of machine learning approaches. However, progress is hindered and comparisons thwarted because the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that the gut microbiota of this healthy individual contains numerous active prophages (Figure 1B), similar to what was observed in the gut of healthy mice [26]. We leveraged multiple prophage predictors [66] and focused on medium-to-high quality bacterial bins, as well as prophages found on bacterial scaffolds without host-flanking regions [26]. Prophages from scaffolds without host-flanking regions decrease accuracy of prophage assignment to host [58], but was a necessary approach as few prophages were assembled with host flanking regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We show that the gut microbiota of this healthy individual contains numerous active prophages (Figure 1B), similar to what was observed in the gut of healthy mice [26]. We leveraged multiple prophage predictors [66] and focused on medium-to-high quality bacterial bins, as well as prophages found on bacterial scaffolds without host-flanking regions [26]. Prophages from scaffolds without host-flanking regions decrease accuracy of prophage assignment to host [58], but was a necessary approach as few prophages were assembled with host flanking regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In this study, we used prediction tools that search for viruses. However, because VirSorter2 has been reported to have difficulty distinguishing plasmids from viral sequences ( 51 , 56 , 57 ), we wanted to address the possibility that predictions from any tool may resemble other types of Neisseria MGEs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PhiSpy ( 50 ) uses machine learning to search for characteristics that are unique to prophages (i.e., phages integrated in bacterial genomes), while VirSorter2 ( 51 , 88 ) combines alignment and machine learning-based approaches to identify microbial viruses. PhiSpy and VirSorter2 both performed well when evaluated for their ability to predict prophages in bacterial genomes ( 56 ). We also selected Seeker ( 52 ), which uses deep learning to detect phages without relying on sequence features (e.g., genes or k-mers) to explore potential novel prophage diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our inference of additional host species is limited by whether genomes encode CRISPR spacers (e.g., N. gonorrhoeae genomes do not encode CRISPR arrays). Moreover, we only used 3 virus prediction tools and among them only PhiSpy was specifically designed to predict prophages (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used prediction tools that search for viruses. However, because VirSorter2 has been reported to have difficulty distinguishing plasmids from viral sequences (49,52,53), we wanted to address the possibility that predictions from any of the tools may resemble other types of Neisseria MGEs. Specifically, we compared our predictions to known Neisseria plasmids and the Gonococcal Genetic Island (GGI).…”
Section: Few Predictions Are Similar To Neisseria Plasmids and The Go...mentioning
confidence: 99%