2016
DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2016.1145495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophy for Teachers (P4T) – developing new teachers’ applied ethical decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrespective of its geographical location, teaching is always influenced and impacted upon by specific social-cultural contexts, which are constantly changing and are fraught with moral ambiguity (Orchard, Heilbronn and Winstanley 2016). Pre-service teachers do not yet have the necessary knowledge, skills, and aptitudes to navigate these contingencies, and our Faculty is certainly not the only teacher education space in Africa, or elsewhere, where the priority of teaching as a relational practice, is being neglected.…”
Section: Implications For Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrespective of its geographical location, teaching is always influenced and impacted upon by specific social-cultural contexts, which are constantly changing and are fraught with moral ambiguity (Orchard, Heilbronn and Winstanley 2016). Pre-service teachers do not yet have the necessary knowledge, skills, and aptitudes to navigate these contingencies, and our Faculty is certainly not the only teacher education space in Africa, or elsewhere, where the priority of teaching as a relational practice, is being neglected.…”
Section: Implications For Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current context ‘being solid with’ means endorsing their work and supporting them in their gaining the relevant skills and knowledge and most importantly also ‘sharing their burdens’, the tensions and contradictions of teacher existence (Heilbronn, , p. 46). Teacher educators particularly have a responsibility to prepare the teachers they form ‘to understand the moral and ethical complexities of their role, to enable them to reflect ethical actions and decisions in their professional practice’ (Campbell, , p. 255), Often in pre‐service and in‐service education the time and opportunity to reflect on these matters and to develop these dispositions is woefully lacking (Heilbronn, ; Orchard et al ., ). With the confidence to face such ambiguity it is hoped that teachers will have the courage to also remain solid, that is be in solidarity, with their students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But policy writers do not work in a ‘vacuum’ and are themselves dependent on the work of school staff and researchers. For example, in recent years an important theme amongst philosophers of education has centred on how philosophy can be brought to illuminate the landscape of policy and practice, and many philosophers may have direct expertise in this area (Arthur et al ., 2016; Bridges, 2017; Curren, 2017; Webster & Pring, 2018; Orchard & Davids, 2019; White, 2019; Biesta, 2020). Whilst many philosophers of education are now or have been teachers, as school staff have to enact such policy, it makes sense to not only bring them into such conversations, but also listen seriously and take account of their particular expertise.…”
Section: Possibilities For Online Friendshipmentioning
confidence: 99%