2015
DOI: 10.1515/helmin-2015-0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philocorydoras longus sp. n. (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) from the gills of Hoplosternum littorale (Siluriformes, Callichthyidae) in Southeastern Brazil and the reassignment of two species from the genus Urocleidoides to Philocorydoras

Abstract: SummaryPhilocorydoras longus sp. n. (Dactylogryridae) is described from the gills of the freshwater fi sh Hoplosternum littorale (Hancock, 1828) (Callichthyidae) from Jurumirim reservoir, Upper Paranapanema River, São Paulo State, Brazil. This new species belongs to the genus Philocorydoras mainly by possessing a curved cirrus accompanied by an accessory piece attached by a conspicuous fi lament. Philocorydoras longus sp. n. most resembles P. platensis, but differs by having delicate and smaller hooks, grooves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some species of Urocleidoides have been described and posteriorly relocated to other genera: Demidospermus lebedevi (Kritsky & Thatcher, 1976); Diaphorocleidus affinis (Mizelle, Kritsky & Crane, 1968); Diaphorocleidus kabatai (Molnar, Hanek & Fernando, 1974); Diaphorocleidus microstomus (Mizelle, Kritsky & Crane, 1968); Philocorydoras corydori (Molnar, Hanek & Fernando, 1974); Philocorydori margolisi (Molnar, Hanek & Fernando, 1974); Palombitrema heteroancistrium (Price & Bussing, 1968); Characithecium costaricensis (Price & Bussing, 1967) and Nanayella megorchis (Mizelle & Kritsky, 1969) (Price & Bussing, 1968;Kritsky et al, 2000;Jogunoori et al, 2004;Mendoza-Franco et al, 2009;Yamada et al, 2015;Acosta et al, 2019), due to the absence of morphological characters (i.e., presence of vaginal sclerite, MCO rolled counterclockwise, hook pair 1 and 5 reduced) that define this genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some species of Urocleidoides have been described and posteriorly relocated to other genera: Demidospermus lebedevi (Kritsky & Thatcher, 1976); Diaphorocleidus affinis (Mizelle, Kritsky & Crane, 1968); Diaphorocleidus kabatai (Molnar, Hanek & Fernando, 1974); Diaphorocleidus microstomus (Mizelle, Kritsky & Crane, 1968); Philocorydoras corydori (Molnar, Hanek & Fernando, 1974); Philocorydori margolisi (Molnar, Hanek & Fernando, 1974); Palombitrema heteroancistrium (Price & Bussing, 1968); Characithecium costaricensis (Price & Bussing, 1967) and Nanayella megorchis (Mizelle & Kritsky, 1969) (Price & Bussing, 1968;Kritsky et al, 2000;Jogunoori et al, 2004;Mendoza-Franco et al, 2009;Yamada et al, 2015;Acosta et al, 2019), due to the absence of morphological characters (i.e., presence of vaginal sclerite, MCO rolled counterclockwise, hook pair 1 and 5 reduced) that define this genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the present study, from the species of Urocleidoides previously considered incertae sedis by Kritsky et al (1986), 14 have been synonymized or relocated into other genera as follows: Palombitrema Price & Bussing, 1968 (1 species); Demidospermus Suriano, 1983 (1 species); Philocorydoras Suriano, 1986 (2 species); Sciadicleithrum Kritsky, Thatcher & Boeger, 1989 (1 species); Ameloblastella (2 species), Aphanoblastella (2 species), Diaphorocleidus Jogunoori, Kritsky & Venkatanarasaiah, 2004(3 species), Characithecium Mendoza-Franco, Reina & Torchin, 2009 (1 species); Nanayella Acosta et al, 2019 (1 species) (Price & Bussing 1968;Kritsky et al 1989;Kritsky et al 2000;Mendoza-Franco et al 2003;Jogunoori et al 2004;Mendoza-Franco et al 2009;Mendoza-Palmero & Scholz 2011;Yamada et al 2015;Acosta et al 2019). However, even though the correct taxonomic status of several species has been established, nine are still considered incertae sedisnamely, Urocleidoides stictus Mizelle, Kritsky & Crane, 1968, Urocleidoides strombicirrus (Price & Bussing, 1967) Thatcher, 1974, andUrocleidoides trinidadensis Molnar, Hanek &Fernando, 1974 reported from the gills of Characiformes; Urocleidoides gymnotus, Urocleidoides carapus, Urocleidoides virescens Mizelle, Kritsky & Crane, 1968, and Urocleidoides advenai found in the gills of Gymnotiformes; and Urocleidoides amazonensis Mizelle & Kritsky, 1969 and Urocleidoides catus Mizelle & Kritsky, 1969 from the gills of Siluriformes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although species of Urocleidoides have a wide distribution in the tropics, there are still few studies documenting the diversity of Monogenoidea in the Neotropical Region, considering the great biodiversity of host species. Among the species that were considered incertae sedis, eight remain uncertain and 16 have been allocated to other genera (Kritsky et al 1986, 1989, 2000, Jogunoori et al 2004, Mendoza-Franco et al 2009, Yamada et al 2015, Acosta et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%