2018
DOI: 10.3790/hpb.66.1.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philip Haas: Fürstenehe und Interessen. Die dynastische Ehe der Frühen Neuzeit in zeitgenössischer Traktatliteratur und politischer Praxis am Beispiel Hessen-Kassels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 It emerges now that the distinct organization of these areas often facilitated alternative communicative pathways which could enable courtly actors to negotiate tentative alliances without losing face should these not come to fruition. 14 The court now emerges as a truly polycentric political entity. Finally, the shared modes of communication that organized patronage, ritual, and status interaction also helped to foster a certain cohesion among the extremely heterogeneous courtly actors: though many of them were engaged in confrontational competition, nevertheless they were all invested in the same marketplace and thus sustained it.…”
Section: Models Monarchs and Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 It emerges now that the distinct organization of these areas often facilitated alternative communicative pathways which could enable courtly actors to negotiate tentative alliances without losing face should these not come to fruition. 14 The court now emerges as a truly polycentric political entity. Finally, the shared modes of communication that organized patronage, ritual, and status interaction also helped to foster a certain cohesion among the extremely heterogeneous courtly actors: though many of them were engaged in confrontational competition, nevertheless they were all invested in the same marketplace and thus sustained it.…”
Section: Models Monarchs and Menmentioning
confidence: 99%