2017
DOI: 10.22230/cjnser.2017v8n1a224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philanthropic Behaviour of Quebecers

Abstract: Residents of Québec typically give less money and volunteer less time compared to residents of all other provinces. This article employs the most recent General Social Survey: Giving, Volunteering and Participating (2013) data set and Tobit procedures and finds that Quebeckers give less money largely because of smaller endowments of two important determinants, religiosity and household income. Once demographic and socioeconomic characteristics are controlled, Quebeckers' financial donations are comparable to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, diary and time use studies ask people to record how they use their time throughout the day and study the amount of time donated within larger time-use decisions (e.g., Havens and Schervish 2001). Other approaches include studying motivations for philanthropic behavior (e.g., Lam et al 2011;Devlin and Zhao 2017;Nelson et al 2018;Neumayr and Handy 2019;Radovanović 2019a;; volunteering and helping (Radovanović 2019c); helping orientation (e.g., Maki et al 2017); love and compassion (Sequera 2020); the role of emotions (e.g., Ugazio et al 2012); psychological influences on volunteering (e.g., Smith et al 2017); trust and confidence in institutions (e.g., Hager and Hedberg 2016); generational preferences (e.g., Cho et al 2018), and response influences from the length of the survey instrument (Steinberg et Relatedly, Smith et al (2010) studied motivations and benefits of volunteering among students by recruiting participants through universities and evaluating differences in student volunteering experiences by university. Many studies also investigate social group dynamics by examining how race and ethnicity intersect with philanthropy.…”
Section: Micro-level Generositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, diary and time use studies ask people to record how they use their time throughout the day and study the amount of time donated within larger time-use decisions (e.g., Havens and Schervish 2001). Other approaches include studying motivations for philanthropic behavior (e.g., Lam et al 2011;Devlin and Zhao 2017;Nelson et al 2018;Neumayr and Handy 2019;Radovanović 2019a;; volunteering and helping (Radovanović 2019c); helping orientation (e.g., Maki et al 2017); love and compassion (Sequera 2020); the role of emotions (e.g., Ugazio et al 2012); psychological influences on volunteering (e.g., Smith et al 2017); trust and confidence in institutions (e.g., Hager and Hedberg 2016); generational preferences (e.g., Cho et al 2018), and response influences from the length of the survey instrument (Steinberg et Relatedly, Smith et al (2010) studied motivations and benefits of volunteering among students by recruiting participants through universities and evaluating differences in student volunteering experiences by university. Many studies also investigate social group dynamics by examining how race and ethnicity intersect with philanthropy.…”
Section: Micro-level Generositymentioning
confidence: 99%