1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00612-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pheochromocytomas: can malignant potential be predicted?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
127
2
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
127
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the incidence of malignant pheochromocytomas among 152 patients with pheochromocytomas was 11.2%, in good agreement with the 8% to 12.5% previously reported [7][8][9][10][11]. We also found that the 5-year survival rate of our patients with malignant pheochromocytoma was 11.8%, which was thus somewhat lower than the 20% previously reported [12]. Although none of our patients with malignant pheochromocytomas were alive after 10 years, others have reported somewhat better results [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We found that the incidence of malignant pheochromocytomas among 152 patients with pheochromocytomas was 11.2%, in good agreement with the 8% to 12.5% previously reported [7][8][9][10][11]. We also found that the 5-year survival rate of our patients with malignant pheochromocytoma was 11.8%, which was thus somewhat lower than the 20% previously reported [12]. Although none of our patients with malignant pheochromocytomas were alive after 10 years, others have reported somewhat better results [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There are no reliable distinguishing clinical parameters, except that paragangliomas are more often malignant than pheochromocytomas (1,6,8,27,28). Histopathological features usually associated with malignancy, such as nuclear atypia, pleomorphism, vascular invasion, and mitotic activity, may be seen in benign as well as malignant lesions (2,4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting results have been reported for DNA flow cytometry (13,31,32), overexpression of the proto-oncogene products c-erb B-2 and bcl-2 (a marker of apoptosis; 16,33,34), mutations in the tumor suppressor gene p53 and its product (14,33,35), elevated plasma neuropeptide Y levels (36, 37), elevated urinary dopamine levels reflecting an immature secretion pattern (27), and absence of S-100 sustentacular cells (16,17). Immunohistochemical staining for the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin (14), the oncogene product of HER-2/neu (14), PCNA (a marker of proliferative activity; 13), somatic mutations in the RET proto-oncogene (17), and angiogenesis assessed by high microvascular count (15) seem to have no potential diagnostic utility in this tumor type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High preoperative 24 h urinary dopamine levels, extra-adrenal tumour location, high tumour weight, elevated tumour dopamine concentration and postoperative persistent arterial hypertension are all factors that increase the likelihood of malignant phaeochromocytoma. 10,11 Adherence to the recommendation to only report results for urinary noradrenaline and adrenaline resulted in di⁄culty in reaching a diagnosis for our patient because the dopamine excretion was ¢rst measured in 1998 but not noted to be signi¢cantly high until almost two years later. It has been suggested that 3-methoxytyramine may also be a useful diagnostic and monitoring parameter for catecholamine-secreting carotid body tumours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%