2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-014-0375-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PhenUMA: a tool for integrating the biomedical relationships among genes and diseases

Abstract: BackgroundSeveral types of genetic interactions in humans can be directly or indirectly associated with the causal effects of mutations. These interactions are usually based on their co-associations to biological processes, coexistence in cellular locations, coexpression in cell lines, physical interactions and so on. In addition, pathological processes can present similar phenotypes that have mutations either in the same genomic location or in different genomic regions. Therefore, integrative resources for al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the useful databases is PhenUMA (www.phenuma.uma.es). 18 PhenUMA is a great tool to identify pathological relationships based on functional and phenotypic. With this PhenUMA database, a list of DDAs with their OMIM ids were obtained and used for evaluating our DDAs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the useful databases is PhenUMA (www.phenuma.uma.es). 18 PhenUMA is a great tool to identify pathological relationships based on functional and phenotypic. With this PhenUMA database, a list of DDAs with their OMIM ids were obtained and used for evaluating our DDAs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help with the characterization of molecular relationships between different phenotypes and microvariants, we aimed to apply principles of network medicine [ 14 18 ] to find the consequences of variants and their association with diseases. To this end, we focused on the development of a computational approach via tripartite networks made of three types of nodes: variants (CNVs), patients, and phenotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goh et al used a bipartite graph consisting of diseases and genes, using it to connect diseases that share common genetic components [12]. Further studies have built on this work, and it is clear that similar diseases in terms of pathophysiology tend to group together in such networks [13,14]. As well as diseases, there has been increasing interest in their underlying phenotypes and the connections between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%