2016
DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1243405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotyping wheat under salt stress conditions using a 3D laser scanner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…greenhouse, growth chamber) experiments provide greater environmental control, more growing cycles, and are easier environments in which to study root phenotypes, although plants are often constrained by pot dimensions and less natural environmental interactions. For controlled-environment phenotyping, different automated platforms have been described ( Li et al , 2014 ; Poiré et al , 2014 ; Humplík et al , 2015 ; Neilson et al , 2015 ; Pandey et al , 2017 ), such as the Scanalyzer 3D imaging system, in which plants are placed on a conveyor system and moved to sensors for automated image acquisition ( Neilson et al , 2015 ), PlantEye, a 3D laser scanner mounted on a movable gantry, where a sensor is moved to image the plants ( Kjaer and Ottosen, 2015 ; Vadez et al , 2015 ; Maphosa et al , 2017 ), Phenoscope ( Tisné et al , 2013 ), Phenosis ( Granier et al , 2006 ), and Weighing, Imaging and Watering Machines (WIWAM) ( Skirycz et al , 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…greenhouse, growth chamber) experiments provide greater environmental control, more growing cycles, and are easier environments in which to study root phenotypes, although plants are often constrained by pot dimensions and less natural environmental interactions. For controlled-environment phenotyping, different automated platforms have been described ( Li et al , 2014 ; Poiré et al , 2014 ; Humplík et al , 2015 ; Neilson et al , 2015 ; Pandey et al , 2017 ), such as the Scanalyzer 3D imaging system, in which plants are placed on a conveyor system and moved to sensors for automated image acquisition ( Neilson et al , 2015 ), PlantEye, a 3D laser scanner mounted on a movable gantry, where a sensor is moved to image the plants ( Kjaer and Ottosen, 2015 ; Vadez et al , 2015 ; Maphosa et al , 2017 ), Phenoscope ( Tisné et al , 2013 ), Phenosis ( Granier et al , 2006 ), and Weighing, Imaging and Watering Machines (WIWAM) ( Skirycz et al , 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PlantEye was previously mainly applied in agronomy studies for the phenotyping of crop plant individuals and it was verified that the results of DWCP estimates correlate very well with manual measurements (Maphosa et al 2017, Manavalan et al 2021). It is equipped with an active sensor that projects a near‐infrared (940 nm) laser line vertically onto the plant canopy and captures the reflection of the laser and the reflectance in red, green, blue and near‐infrared wavelength with an inbuilt camera (Kjaer and Ottosen 2015, Maphosa et al 2017). Each scan has a resolution of < 1 mm pixel –1 and the data points of each scan are merged to generate a 3D point cloud.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The approach involves application of sensor or image-based tools, to non-destructively and non-evasively measure crop traits across time and space. The screening tools can be handheld (Tracy et al ., 2020), airborne (Bian et al ., 2019), ground-based vehicles (Maphosa et al ., 2017), thermal and hyperspectral imagery or shovelomics (Chen et al ., 2017). Key production traits that can be captured include phenology, early vigour, crop growth status, water content, biomass, yield potential and grain quality (colour and size).…”
Section: Production Improvement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%