2019
DOI: 10.14740/jocmr3830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotyping to Facilitate Accrual for a Cardiovascular Intervention

Abstract: Background The conventional approach for clinical studies is to identify a cohort of potentially eligible patients and then screen for enrollment. In an effort to reduce the cost and manual effort involved in the screening process, several studies have leveraged electronic health records (EHR) to refine cohorts to better match the eligibility criteria, which is referred to as phenotyping. We extend this approach to dynamically identify a cohort by repeating phenotyping in alternation with manual s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remote optimization program was organized as a quality improvement initiative, with design details as previously reported. 5 Patients with a chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less who were receiving longitudinal cardiovascular follow-up at our center were identified through an electronic health record-based search algorithm 6,7 and contacted via telephone to verify eligibility and willingness to participate in the remote optimization program. For those whose clinicians granted permission, navigators (T.M., J.B.-H., and nonauthors) and pharmacists (J.D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remote optimization program was organized as a quality improvement initiative, with design details as previously reported. 5 Patients with a chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less who were receiving longitudinal cardiovascular follow-up at our center were identified through an electronic health record-based search algorithm 6,7 and contacted via telephone to verify eligibility and willingness to participate in the remote optimization program. For those whose clinicians granted permission, navigators (T.M., J.B.-H., and nonauthors) and pharmacists (J.D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized an electronic health record-based algorithm to identify a cohort of patients with chronic heart failure and most recent left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% as part of an ongoing population health-level quality improvement initiative. 12 Eligible patients were those age > 18 years who had established longitudinal care with specialty cardiology providers at our center (at least 2 clinic visits, including one within the last 18 months). Patients with end-stage HF requiring inotropic or mechanical circulatory support, those with prior cardiac transplantation or actively listed for transplantation, and those enrolled in hospice or palliative care were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of our evaluation is that we did not evaluate the “local-concept-map” Logic, as the MIMIC-III dataset already has standard codes for diagnosis and laboratory result, i.e., ICD and LOINC, respectively. Second, we limited our derived concepts to simple rules although machine learning models can be modeled using our current implementation mechanism [ 14 ]: our system supports machine learning via Pyspark-based algorithms that can run within a data pipeline. Our systems provide the mechanism to execute a programming script that results into a derived fact for each patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%