2023
DOI: 10.1002/ppj2.20081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotyping agronomic and physiological traits in peanut under mid‐season drought stress using UAV‐based hyperspectral imaging and machine learning

Kamand Bagherian,
Rafael Bidese‐Puhl,
Yin Bao
et al.

Abstract: Agronomic and physiological traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) are important to breeders for selecting high‐yielding and resilient genotypes. However, direct measurement of these traits is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. This study assessed the feasibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)‐based hyperspectral imaging and machine learning (ML) techniques to predict three agronomic traits (biomass, pod count, and yield) and two physiological traits (photosynthesis and stomatal conductance) in peanut u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenotypes extracted at an elementary level from field plots in this study and others have been directly correlated with yield, but none of these showed a strong or consistent enough correlation to be reliably predictive on their own, indicating the need for more sophisticated ML methodologies ( Manley et al., 2023 ). Across the entire dataset, the performance of the RF and XGBoost models constructed in this study was superior to those seen in previous studies in peanut ( Balota and Oakes, 2016 ; Bagherian et al., 2023 ; Shahi et al., 2023 ). In Balota and Oakes (2016) , the R 2 for yield was significantly lower than in the present study, ranging from 0.26 – 0.39.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Phenotypes extracted at an elementary level from field plots in this study and others have been directly correlated with yield, but none of these showed a strong or consistent enough correlation to be reliably predictive on their own, indicating the need for more sophisticated ML methodologies ( Manley et al., 2023 ). Across the entire dataset, the performance of the RF and XGBoost models constructed in this study was superior to those seen in previous studies in peanut ( Balota and Oakes, 2016 ; Bagherian et al., 2023 ; Shahi et al., 2023 ). In Balota and Oakes (2016) , the R 2 for yield was significantly lower than in the present study, ranging from 0.26 – 0.39.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In Balota and Oakes (2016) , the R 2 for yield was significantly lower than in the present study, ranging from 0.26 – 0.39. In Bagherian et al. (2023) , the highest R 2 achieved for estimating yield with Deep Learning (DL) and ML models was 0.61.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EXtreme Gradient Boosting is an advanced implementation of gradient boosting algorithms that builds trees sequentially, so that each new tree can correct the errors made by each previous tree, resulting in reduced error . Recent research in peanuts has shown that ML models can potentially be used to estimate various important traits via the use of the values of visual bands in RGB and multispectral imagery (Bagherian et al, 2023;Shahi et al, 2023). However, AI powered by remote sensing data has not yet been used across multiple years and a diverse set of material to assess models for their robustness in peanut (Bagherian et al, 2023;Shahi et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%