Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA testing is the gold standard for monitoring antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. However, equipment and reagent costs preclude widespread use of the assay in resource-limited settings. The Perkin-Elmer Ultrasensitive p24 assay and the Cavidi Exavir Load assay both offer potentially simpler, less costly technologies for monitoring viral load. These assays were compared to the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, v1.5, using panels of clinical samples (subtype B) from HIV-positive subjects and HIV-spiked samples (subtypes A, C, D, CRF_01AE, CRF_02AG, and F). The Ultrasensitive p24 assay detected 100% of the spiked samples with virus loads of >250,000copies/ml and 61% of the clinical samples with virus loads of 219 to 288,850 copies/ml. Detection rates were improved substantially if an external lysis buffer was added to the procedure. The Cavidi assay detected 54 to 100% of spiked samples with virus loads >10,000 copies/ml and 68% of the clinical samples. These detection rates were also greatly improved with a newly implemented version of this kit. Coefficients of variation demonstrate good reproducibility for each of these kits. The results from the Cavidi v1.0, Cavidi v2.0, and Perkin-Elmer, and the Perkin-Elmer Plus external buffers all correlated well with the results from the Roche Monitor Test (r ؍ 0.83 to 0.96, r ؍ 0.84 to 0.99, r ؍ 0.58 to 0.67, and r ؍ 0.59 to 0.95, respectively). Thus, the use of these two assays for monitoring patients, together with less-frequent confirmation testing, offers a feasible alternative to frequent HIV RNA testing in resource-limited settings.The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic has affected countries worldwide, but the impact on resource-limited countries has been especially devastating. Pressure to lower the cost of antiretroviral therapies (ART) has been critical in fighting this battle. The current challenge is to identify simplified assays for monitoring patients on ART that are less expensive and less technically demanding with respect to facilities and instrumentation (6, 12). In the past, the compromise for using simplified methods has often been reduced sensitivity or poor correlation with the gold standards used in industrialized settings (4, 10). We compare here two commercially available kits that measure HIV-specific proteins, p24 and reverse transcriptase (RT), respectively, and utilize simpler technologies to perform the tests. The first method is the Ultrasensitive HIV p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; HIV-1 p24 ELISA plus the ELAST ELISA Amplification System; Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Inc.), and the second is the RT assay (Exavir Load Assay; Cavidi Tech AB, Sweden). Both kits offer less expensive alternatives for detecting HIV.For the Ultrasensitive p24 assay, a standard ELISA format is used for the capture and detection of HIV p24 coupled with a specific signal amplification to increase the assay sensitivity. Heat denaturation of the plasma prior to binding in the ELISA step he...