2017
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic selection varies with pollination intensity across populations ofSabatia angularis

Abstract: Pollinators are considered primary selective agents acting on plant traits, and thus variation in the strength of the plant-pollinator interaction might drive variation in the opportunity for selection and selection intensity across plant populations. Here, we examine whether these critical evolutionary parameters covary with pollination intensity across wild populations of the biennial Sabatia angularis. We quantified pollination intensity in each of nine S. angularis populations as mean stigmatic pollen load… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, because S. angularis is monocarpic and flowering is indeterminate, fitness gains should rise sharply with continued allocation to the construction of new flowers provided resources are available, even if each flower is slightly shorter lived. Importantly, S. angularis plants under high resource levels produced nearly the five times as many flowers more rapidly compared to low resources, which could be key given selection on flowering duration in wild populations (Emel et al ., ) against a backdrop of continuous resource depletion across the reproductive season (Spigler, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, because S. angularis is monocarpic and flowering is indeterminate, fitness gains should rise sharply with continued allocation to the construction of new flowers provided resources are available, even if each flower is slightly shorter lived. Importantly, S. angularis plants under high resource levels produced nearly the five times as many flowers more rapidly compared to low resources, which could be key given selection on flowering duration in wild populations (Emel et al ., ) against a backdrop of continuous resource depletion across the reproductive season (Spigler, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate flower size, we measured the length and width (mm) of one random petal for each of three flowers in female phase. The product of petal length and width (petal area) is highly correlated with total flower area (r 24 = 0.90, P < 0.0001; Emel et al, 2017). For all flower-level measurements, we controlled for flower position.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016; Emel et al. 2017). Despite their complexity, plant‐animal interactions often provide tractable study systems in which both the agents of selection and the traits important for pollination success or other fitness components can be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For plant species that rely on pollinators for successful reproduction, flower–visitor interactions are considered to be important drivers of plant trait diversification (Crepet and Niklas, and references therein; Emel et al., ; but see Souto‐Vilarós et al., ). Such diversification can be expected when a functional group of pollinators shows preferences for a particular floral syndrome, i.e., suites of floral morphology and reward traits related to the attraction of a specific pollinator group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%