2019
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic relationships, genetic parameters, genome-wide associations, and identification of potential candidate genes for ketosis and fat-to-protein ratio in German Holstein cows

Abstract: Energy demand for milk production in early lactation exceeds energy intake, especially in high-yielding Holstein cows. Energy deficiency causes increasing susceptibility to metabolic disorders. In addition to several blood parameters, the fat-to-protein ratio (FPR) is suggested as an indicator for ketosis, because a FPR >1.5 refers to high lipolysis. The aim of this study was to analyze phenotypic, quantitative genetic, and genomic associations between FPR and ketosis. In this regard, 8,912 first-lactation Hol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations into genetic selection for HYK susceptibility have predominately relied on voluntary records provided by dairy producers. Threshold model heritability estimates have ranged from 0.02 to 0.17 in Holstein cows (Kadarmideen et al, 2000;Zwald et al, 2004;Parker Gaddis et al, 2014;Klein et al, 2019). Presently, Zoetis Genetics (Kalamazoo, MI) is the only provider of genomic evaluations for HYK susceptibility, which is marketed as ketosis resistance, based on voluntary records in the United States (Vukasinovic et al, 2017); however, misclassification of HYK cases as controls (or as nonevents) is a problem with voluntary records, especially when considering subclinical cases and the variation in HYK diagnosis criteria (Oetzel, 2004;Pryce et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genetic and Genomic Management Of Ketosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Investigations into genetic selection for HYK susceptibility have predominately relied on voluntary records provided by dairy producers. Threshold model heritability estimates have ranged from 0.02 to 0.17 in Holstein cows (Kadarmideen et al, 2000;Zwald et al, 2004;Parker Gaddis et al, 2014;Klein et al, 2019). Presently, Zoetis Genetics (Kalamazoo, MI) is the only provider of genomic evaluations for HYK susceptibility, which is marketed as ketosis resistance, based on voluntary records in the United States (Vukasinovic et al, 2017); however, misclassification of HYK cases as controls (or as nonevents) is a problem with voluntary records, especially when considering subclinical cases and the variation in HYK diagnosis criteria (Oetzel, 2004;Pryce et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genetic and Genomic Management Of Ketosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for HYK may indicate a subset of SNP worthy of increased weighting in genomic evaluation of HYK susceptibility [e.g., weighted genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)]. Previous GWAS for HYK based on voluntary records have not identified SNP with genome-wide significant associations (Parker Gaddis et al, 2018;Klein et al, 2019). We believe the present lack of genome-wide associations is due to voluntary record HYK phenotypes having variation in trait definition across herds (i.e., subclinical vs. clinical, urine vs. blood ketone body metrics) and having high misclassification rates caused by insufficient assessment frequency (i.e., only 1 blood BHB measurement within the first 21 DIM).…”
Section: Genetic and Genomic Management Of Ketosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting in 2013 in the framework of the German cow training set project (e.g., Klein et al, 2019), all first-calving cows from the so-called contract herds were considered for genotyping. Hence, the genotyped 17,362 cows represent a random sample of the herd, especially for the birth years 2011 and later.…”
Section: Cow Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although well adapted to grazing systems, DSN are exposed to metabolic stress due to heat stress impact on pastures and associated mobilization of body reserve in response to restricted feed intake. The fat-to-protein ratio (FPR) is a valuable indicator for metabolic health (e.g., ketosis) and for metabolic stability in this regard [26,27]. Moreover, FPR might be a novel indicator trait for robustness in DSN, especially in the context of challenging heat stress environments in outdoor systems [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%