2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00480.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic plasticity and the evolution of trade-offs: the quantitative genetics of resource allocation in the wing dimorphic cricket, Gryllus firmus

Abstract: In the wing dimorphic sand cricket, Gryllus firmus, there is a pronounced tradeoff between flight capability and fecundity. This trade-off is found both between morphs and within the macropterous morph, in which fecundity is negatively correlated with the mass of the principle flight muscles, the dorsolongitudinal muscles (DLM). In this paper, we examine how this trade-off is affected by a reduction in food and its genetic basis. We find that the relative fitness of the two wing morphs is not changed although … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ornamentation does not impose any detectable energetic costs and honesty may instead be maintained by social costs or predation (Berglund et al 1997). In R. tarsata, pinnate scales are a morphological trait of fixed size in the adult; however, pinnate scales may divert female resources from reproductive organs during development (Emlen 2001;Roff & Gelinas 2003) or increase susceptibility to predation (Cumming 1994). Such potential costs of the ornamentation in R. tarsasta are unknown; however, we have shown equivalent allometry for offspring and ornaments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The ornamentation does not impose any detectable energetic costs and honesty may instead be maintained by social costs or predation (Berglund et al 1997). In R. tarsata, pinnate scales are a morphological trait of fixed size in the adult; however, pinnate scales may divert female resources from reproductive organs during development (Emlen 2001;Roff & Gelinas 2003) or increase susceptibility to predation (Cumming 1994). Such potential costs of the ornamentation in R. tarsasta are unknown; however, we have shown equivalent allometry for offspring and ornaments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For example, DeHaan et al (2005) contrast phenotypic tradeoff models unfavorably with quantitative genetic tradeoff (QGT) models based on research on wing dimorphism in crickets (Roff et al 2002;Roff and Gelinas 2003). They argue, "Only if tradeoffs are held to be static and bivariate can the phenotypic model be applied to perennial grain breeding" (20).…”
Section: Sexual Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor can phenotypic plasticity independent of ecological constraint be simply assumed by virtue of its theoretical possibility in QGT models (Roff and Fairbairn 2007). This is apparent in the empirical results for the crickets: (S-strategist) winged female crickets are unable to reallocate the energetic budget invested in their wing musculature to reproduction in circumstances of dietary constraint, giving vestigial-winged (R-strategist) females a slight (nonsignificant) reproductive advantage (Roff and Gelinas 2003). Some insect species appear able to switch from S to R strategies, whereas others cannot, but the switch is typically a "monocarpic" (once reproducing) one that maximizes a one-off reproductive output at the end of the adult lifecycle.…”
Section: Sexual Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For invertebrate animals changes in fecundity due to dietary effects have been recorded for different systems and taxa including changes associated with food limitation [36], [37], moisture content in the diet [38], specific nutrient deficiency [4], [39], diet composition [40], [41], [42] and presence of inhibitory secondary metabolites [43], [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%