Low replicability of animal experiments is perceived as a major hurdle in the field of biomedicine. Attempts to enhance the replicability and to reduce the variability in basic research has led to a recommendation to use isogenic mice. The C57BL/6 strain has evolved as a gold standard strain for this purpose. However, the C57BL/6 mice are maintained as sub-strains by multiple vendors. Evidence exists that the subtle differences between these mouse lines have not been systematically investigated and are often ignored. In the present study, we characterized the female mice of two closely related sub-strains (C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N) from three vendors in Europe (Charles River Laboratories, Envigo, Janvier Labs) in a battery of behavioral tests. Our data show and confirm substantial behavioral differences between the C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice. Importantly, the sub-strain differences were largely affected by the origin of animals, as a significant effect of vendor or interaction between the sub-strain and vendor occurred in all tests. This work highlights the importance of adhering to precise international nomenclature in all publications reporting the animal experiments. Moreover, the generalization of research findings from a single mouse sub-strain can be seriously limited due to genetic drift and environmental variables at different vendors. However, generalizability can be enhanced by heterogenization of samples by including the animals of different substrains. These issues need to be seriously considered for improving reproducibility, replicability and translational potential of the mouse models.