2013
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic correlates of the lianescent growth form: a review

Abstract: BackgroundAs proposed by Darwin, climbers have been assumed to allocate a smaller fraction of biomass to support organs in comparison with self-supporting plants. They have also been hypothesized to possess a set of traits associated with fast growth, resource uptake and high productivity.ScopeIn this review, these hypotheses are evaluated by assembling and synthesizing published and unpublished data sets from across the globe concerning resource allocation, growth rates and traits of leaves, stems and roots o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
114
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(282 reference statements)
10
114
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the main differences, trees show a greater allocation of biomass (and carbon) to stems and lianas have lower costs of height gain and larger total leaf area potential. Moreover, compared to shrubs and trees, lianas have lower leaf mass per area (LMA, the inverse of SLA), higher foliar N and higher mass-based photosynthetic rate, which is consistent with the characterization of lianas as fast metabolism/rapid turnover species [71]. This could be related to hypothetical differences in generation time between lianas and trees that could explain their differential evolutionary rates, as shown here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Among the main differences, trees show a greater allocation of biomass (and carbon) to stems and lianas have lower costs of height gain and larger total leaf area potential. Moreover, compared to shrubs and trees, lianas have lower leaf mass per area (LMA, the inverse of SLA), higher foliar N and higher mass-based photosynthetic rate, which is consistent with the characterization of lianas as fast metabolism/rapid turnover species [71]. This could be related to hypothetical differences in generation time between lianas and trees that could explain their differential evolutionary rates, as shown here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Lianas are well known for having wider vessels in their wood than the vessels of their self-supporting relatives (Ewers et al, 1990(Ewers et al, , 1997Ewers and Fisher 1991;Carlquist, 1991;DiasLeme, 1999;Angyalossy et al, 2012;Wyka et al, 2013). The widest vessels are found in the Leguminosae Dioclea: 500 mm (Angyalossy et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Lianescent Habit and Root Wood Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique distribution of lianas may be explained by the ability of lianas to grow more than competing trees during the dry season, which may confer a competitive advantage for lianas ). This hypothesis is now supported empirically by a number of studies that show that lianas are more physiologically active than trees during the dry season relative to the wet season Zhu and Cao 2009 ;Wyka et al 2013 ;Alvarez-Cansino et al 2015 ;Chen et al 2015 ), and thus the pattern of liana distribution appears to be controlled predominantly by the ability of lianas to grow when their tree competitors are largely dormant. By contrast, lianas may be in much lower abundance in aseasonal, wet forests, where water is rarely limiting and radiation is relatively low year-round, and thus lianas gain no such advantage .…”
Section: Pan-tropical Distribution Of Relative Liana Density and Divementioning
confidence: 90%