2023
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and genotypic infidelity in B-lineage neoplasms, including transdifferentiation following targeted therapy: Report from the 2021 SH/EAHP Workshop

Abstract: Objectives Session 2 of the 2021 Society for Hematopathology and European Association for Haematopathology Workshop collected examples of lineage infidelity and transdifferentiation in B-lineage neoplasms, including after targeted therapy. Methods Twenty cases were submitted. Whole-exome sequencing and genome-wide RNA expression analysis were available on a limited subsample. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 102 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients with multiple synchronous or metachronous hematological malignancies, prognosis or treatment might be different depending on whether the lesions are clonally related or not [ 86 ]. Importantly, hematological malignancies that originate from the same clone may differ in morphology and immunophenotype which may even include a switch in lineage, sometimes due to so-called transdifferentiation [ 32 ]. In conventional clonality analysis, comparison based on clonal peak sizes can be inaccurate due to small sequence changes caused by mutations and technical artifacts [ 50 , 70 ].…”
Section: Clonality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with multiple synchronous or metachronous hematological malignancies, prognosis or treatment might be different depending on whether the lesions are clonally related or not [ 86 ]. Importantly, hematological malignancies that originate from the same clone may differ in morphology and immunophenotype which may even include a switch in lineage, sometimes due to so-called transdifferentiation [ 32 ]. In conventional clonality analysis, comparison based on clonal peak sizes can be inaccurate due to small sequence changes caused by mutations and technical artifacts [ 50 , 70 ].…”
Section: Clonality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%