2009
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2009.0869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and Genotypic Evaluation of Aminoglycoside Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci in Tehran, Iran

Abstract: Aminoglycosides play an important role in the treatment of staphylococcal infections, despite the emerging widespread resistance among Staphylococcus. To determine the prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and aminoglycoside modifying enzyme (AME) genes among infected patients at a teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran, we tested 585 Staphylococcus isolates, of which 322 were Staphylococcus aureus and 263 were coagulase-negative staphylococci, as determined by the disk diffusion method and multiplex PCR. The min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared these results with our current data an inversion of the resistant phenotypes is observed, with a decrease of gentamicin and tobramycin-resistance (6.3% and 12.9% respectively) followed by a significant increase of kanamycin and amikacin resistance (48.2% for both agents versus 29.2% in 2000), partially due to the predominance of ST80 MRSA clone in the country [14,15]. In addition, in contrast to other studies, the aph(3')-IIIa was the most prevalent AMEs gene (73.3%) in our strains [2,12,13]. The significant differences on the resistance rate and AME gene distribution of S. aureus among Greek regions may be due to the predominance of specific clones and to aminoglycoside usage in each clinical setting combined with a possible horizontal AME gene transfer, as reflected in the results of participating hospitals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared these results with our current data an inversion of the resistant phenotypes is observed, with a decrease of gentamicin and tobramycin-resistance (6.3% and 12.9% respectively) followed by a significant increase of kanamycin and amikacin resistance (48.2% for both agents versus 29.2% in 2000), partially due to the predominance of ST80 MRSA clone in the country [14,15]. In addition, in contrast to other studies, the aph(3')-IIIa was the most prevalent AMEs gene (73.3%) in our strains [2,12,13]. The significant differences on the resistance rate and AME gene distribution of S. aureus among Greek regions may be due to the predominance of specific clones and to aminoglycoside usage in each clinical setting combined with a possible horizontal AME gene transfer, as reflected in the results of participating hospitals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The rate of staphylococcal resistance to aminoglycosides varies from country to country and from year to year [2,11,12,13]. In a European multicenter study during 1999, Schmitz et al reported that 23%, 29% and 31% of S. aureus were resistant to gentamicin, tobramycin and kanamycin, whereas, Hope et al reported that 9% of MRSA and 2.5% of MSSA, collected from bacteraemia cases in UK and Ireland 11 during 2001-2006, were resistant to gentamicin [2,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adenoids might act as a reservoir of potentially pathogenic bacteria [4]. Staphylococcus aureus is a facultative anaerobic, Gram-positive coccus that is an important cause of serious infections in both hospitals and the community and can be isolated from the adenoid of patients with adenoid hypertrophy [5,6]. Because of the importance of S. aureus to health care facilities, many molecular typing methods including the Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) and protein A gene (spa) typing have been developed to determine the common type and to differentiate between the multiresistant strains of S. aureus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the low percentage of strains containing aph(2 )-Ia/aac6 -Ie may explain the low level of gentamicin resistance amongst this sample of MRSA isolates. A 2009 survey of aminoglycoside resistance genes amongst gentamicin-resistant isolates of staphylococci from Tehran, Iran, indicated that the ant(4 )-Ia determinant was present in 28.1% of isolates whilst the aph(2 )-Ia/aac6 -Ie determinant was identified in 93.7% of aminoglycoside-resistant isolates [16]. In contrast, a recent survey of 90 MRSA isolates from 21 hospitals in Spain showed that 61% carried ant(4 )-Ia whilst only 20% carried aph(2 )-Ia/aac6 -Ie.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%