1987
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-19-2-155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and genotypic differentiation in cage populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Duration of development, thorax size and weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2012 ; Salminen et al . 2019 ), we would recommend that attention should also be paid to mitochondrial genotype, in such back-crossing schemes, regardless of whether the expected phenotype is obviously “mitochondrial.” Note that the phenotypic differences observed in our back-crossed tko 25t lines are not the result of genetic heterogeneity within the wild-type lines, even though this may be considerable, as inferred previously for Oregon R ( Lints and Bourgois 1987 ). Back-crossed tko 25t lines within each background had relatively uniform phenotypes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…2012 ; Salminen et al . 2019 ), we would recommend that attention should also be paid to mitochondrial genotype, in such back-crossing schemes, regardless of whether the expected phenotype is obviously “mitochondrial.” Note that the phenotypic differences observed in our back-crossed tko 25t lines are not the result of genetic heterogeneity within the wild-type lines, even though this may be considerable, as inferred previously for Oregon R ( Lints and Bourgois 1987 ). Back-crossed tko 25t lines within each background had relatively uniform phenotypes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Given our previous observations of profound effects of different mtDNA backgrounds on tko 25t (Chen et al 2012;Salminen et al 2019), we would recommend that attention should also be paid to mitochondrial genotype, in such back-crossing schemes, regardless of whether the expected phenotype is obviously 'mitochondrial'. Note that the phenotypic differences observed in our back-crossed tko 25t lines is not the result of genetic heterogeneity within the wildtype lines, even though this may be considerable, as inferred previously for Oregon R (Lints and Bourgois 1987). Back-crossed tko 25t lines within each background had relatively uniform phenotypes.…”
Section: Concluding Commentssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For instance, experiments on flies evolving in a constant thermal environment indicate that lines perform better for many traits at their own rearing temperature than do lines reared at cooler or warmer temperatures (Mourad, 1965;Cavicchi et ai., 1989;Huey et ai., 1991). The higher temperature lines also tolerate high-stress temperatures better than those reared at lower temperatures (Stephanou et ai., 1983;Kilias and Alahiotis, 1985;Lints and Bourgois, 1987;Cavicchi et ai., 1995). However, it is not known whether differences result from reduced tolerance to heat in lines evolving in a cold environment or to increased tolerance of those reared under warmer regimes.…”
Section: Acclimation To High Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%