“…The in vitro surveillance results indicate that MRSA isolates having vancomycin MICs of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL have remained highly susceptible to daptomycin. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Although not a significant factor in the in vitro studies reviewed (given the high and consistent susceptibility rates), it is important to consider the underlying MIC methodology when comparing the results of multiple studies because of testing method variations. 15 Additionally, it is important to consider that most studies linking higher vancomycin MIC values to poorer therapeutic outcome have used Etest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRSA susceptibility is routinely assessed in large surveillance studies, but only rarely are MRSA subpopulations with vancomycin MICs of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL analyzed for antimicrobial activity. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Presence of these isolates is often indicated in surveillance data by the MIC range, MIC 50 or MIC 90 . [57][58][59] However, without a subgroup analysis, clinicians are unable to understand the activity of daptomycin against MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL in the region studied.…”
Section: In Vitro Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[60][61][62] In all, 12 surveillance studies were identified, which included a subgroup analysis of MRSA isolates with 1.5 to 2 µg/mL vancomycin MICs. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] These included isolates from Canada (n = 28), Europe (n = 128), India (n = 18), Israel (n = 165), Italy (n = 8), Korea (n = 317), Taiwan (n = 81), Spain (n = 33), Turkey (n = 116), the United States (n = 533), and unspecified worldwide (n = 18). [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] A weighted average from these studies indicated that 99.1% of the isolates were daptomycin susceptible (MIC ≤1 µg/mL).…”
Section: In Vitro Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in 12 in vitro and 7 clinical studies. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]…”
Current published evidence indicates daptomycin may be an acceptable alternative to vancomycin for MRSA infections, especially bacteremia, involving isolates with vancomycin MIC values of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL. Additional evidence is needed to fully elucidate daptomycin utility in this area.
“…The in vitro surveillance results indicate that MRSA isolates having vancomycin MICs of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL have remained highly susceptible to daptomycin. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Although not a significant factor in the in vitro studies reviewed (given the high and consistent susceptibility rates), it is important to consider the underlying MIC methodology when comparing the results of multiple studies because of testing method variations. 15 Additionally, it is important to consider that most studies linking higher vancomycin MIC values to poorer therapeutic outcome have used Etest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRSA susceptibility is routinely assessed in large surveillance studies, but only rarely are MRSA subpopulations with vancomycin MICs of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL analyzed for antimicrobial activity. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Presence of these isolates is often indicated in surveillance data by the MIC range, MIC 50 or MIC 90 . [57][58][59] However, without a subgroup analysis, clinicians are unable to understand the activity of daptomycin against MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL in the region studied.…”
Section: In Vitro Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[60][61][62] In all, 12 surveillance studies were identified, which included a subgroup analysis of MRSA isolates with 1.5 to 2 µg/mL vancomycin MICs. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] These included isolates from Canada (n = 28), Europe (n = 128), India (n = 18), Israel (n = 165), Italy (n = 8), Korea (n = 317), Taiwan (n = 81), Spain (n = 33), Turkey (n = 116), the United States (n = 533), and unspecified worldwide (n = 18). [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] A weighted average from these studies indicated that 99.1% of the isolates were daptomycin susceptible (MIC ≤1 µg/mL).…”
Section: In Vitro Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in 12 in vitro and 7 clinical studies. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]…”
Current published evidence indicates daptomycin may be an acceptable alternative to vancomycin for MRSA infections, especially bacteremia, involving isolates with vancomycin MIC values of 1.5 to 2 µg/mL. Additional evidence is needed to fully elucidate daptomycin utility in this area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.