1993
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/33/1/i13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenology of high density disruptions in the TFTR tokamak

Abstract: PRINCETON Pl,.AIIMA I_-IYBICB LABORATORY NOTICEThis reportwas preparedas an account of work sponsoredby an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or impl;ed,or assumes any legal liability or responsibilityfor the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information,apparatus, product,or processdisclosed,or r.,Jpresents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
8
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in both prediction cases the experimental data points used by the net to mode. This interpretation reminds us the works already done in tokamaks suggesting that the disruptive instabilities would be caused by a "cold bubble" moving towards the plasma center, as it could be experimentally observed in the electron temperature profile [19,20].…”
Section: Disruption Forecastsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, in both prediction cases the experimental data points used by the net to mode. This interpretation reminds us the works already done in tokamaks suggesting that the disruptive instabilities would be caused by a "cold bubble" moving towards the plasma center, as it could be experimentally observed in the electron temperature profile [19,20].…”
Section: Disruption Forecastsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…some disturbance phenomena develop first around the central part of the plasma column (visualized by the soft X ray central detector), and then the plasma region within the q = 2 magnetic surface (monitored by the Mirnov coils) is affected, destabilizing the m = 2 MHD mode. This interpretation even reminds us of some work already done in tokamaks suggesting that the disruptive instabilities are caused by a 'cold bubble' moving towards the plasma centre, as can already be observed experimentally in the electron temperature profile [19,20]. However, before drawing any definite conclusion, further and more careful investigations will be necessary in order to shed more light about the reality or not of this process.…”
Section: Disruption Forecastsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The EQ signals the beginning of the disruption, but it will be shown later that there is not a precise time for its onset, when it is measured with high time resolution. The erosion of the electron temperature profile has been observed in different tokamaks 3,5,18,19 to have an m/nϭ1/1 structure. We will show in this paper that this m/nϭ1/1 erosion is precipitated by an off-axis erosion starting from the O point of the m/nϭ2/1 mode at the low field side ͑LFS͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large m = 1 kink mode moves a bubble of cold plasma from the edge into the centre and leads to the formation of a hollow current density profile and to destabilization of the m = 2, n = 1 mode. This model describes typical features of density limit disruptions in the TFTR plasma (m = 1 cold bubble, final destabilization of the m = 2, n = 1 mode) [19]. However, simulations of the current profile redistribution before the density limit disruptions in NUCLEAR FUSION, Vo1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%