2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenological NLO analysis of η production at the LHC in the collider and fixed-target modes

Abstract: In view of the good agreement between the LHCb prompt-η c data at √ s = 7 and 8 TeV and the NLO colour-singlet model predictions -i.e. the leading v 2 NRQCD contribution-, we provide predictions in the LHCb acceptance for the forthcoming 13 TeV analysis bearing on data taken during the LHC Run2. We also provide predictions for √ s = 115 GeV for proton-hydrogen collisions in the fixed-target mode which could be studied during the LHC Run3. Our predictions are complemented by a full theoretical uncertainty analy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of the KMR UGD, it has recently been shown in [47], that it includes effectively also higher order corrections of the collinear factorization approach. In this sense should give within our approach a result similar to that found recently in the NLO approach [22] at not too small transverse momenta. In contrast to the collinear NLO approach in our approach we can go to very small transverse momenta close to p T = 0.…”
Section: Unintegrated Gluon Distributionssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the case of the KMR UGD, it has recently been shown in [47], that it includes effectively also higher order corrections of the collinear factorization approach. In this sense should give within our approach a result similar to that found recently in the NLO approach [22] at not too small transverse momenta. In contrast to the collinear NLO approach in our approach we can go to very small transverse momenta close to p T = 0.…”
Section: Unintegrated Gluon Distributionssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previously, the prompt η c (1S) production was discussed in various factorization approaches: collinear factorization [18][19][20][21][22], the TMD-factorization with transverse momentum dependent distributions of on-shell gluons, and on-shell matrix elements [23,24], and the k T -factorization in ref. [25].…”
Section: Jhep02(2020)037mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p T dependence of the prompt cross-section ratio is found to be linear with a slope of 0.22 ± 0.11 GeV −1 . While the integrated cross-section is in good agreement with the colour-singlet model prediction [32], a hint of a difference between the J/ψ and η c slopes motivates the extension of the measurement to larger p T values. A larger measured slope with respect to the prediction from Ref.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On The η C Productionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The LHCb collaboration measured the prompt η c production cross-section in proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of √ s = 7 and 8 TeV [18] to be below the predictions based on J/ψ prompt production data [19][20][21][22][23], which motivated several groups to revisit the theoretical approach [24][25][26][28][29][30][31]. A study of the η c prompt production at √ s = 13 TeV provides a further important test for theories predicting the J/ψ and η c hadroproduction cross-sections and the J/ψ polarisation [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most famous one of those is the J/ψ polarization puzzle. In the last decade, many processes have been calculated up to QCD next-to-leading order (NLO), including the J/ψ [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and the η c [28] production in e + e − annihilation, the J/ψ photoproduction in e + e − [29] and ep [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] collisions, the ψ [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], η c [58][59][60][61][62], and χ c [63][64][65]…”
Section: Jhep10(2019)234mentioning
confidence: 99%