2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.96.010402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenological modeling of durotaxis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations, combined with those in Refs. [35,50,51] which demonstrate a net flux of persistent random walkers toward regions of larger persistence, ultimately explain the origin of topotaxis in our system. ABPs migrate, on average, toward regions of higher persistence, hence to regions of lower obstacle density.…”
Section: B the Physical Origin Of Topotaxismentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These observations, combined with those in Refs. [35,50,51] which demonstrate a net flux of persistent random walkers toward regions of larger persistence, ultimately explain the origin of topotaxis in our system. ABPs migrate, on average, toward regions of higher persistence, hence to regions of lower obstacle density.…”
Section: B the Physical Origin Of Topotaxismentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As is the case in our system (Sec. III A), this effect is stronger in the presence of larger gradients [35,50]. In order to understand whether or not such a space-dependent persistence might explain the observed topotactic motion, we study and characterize the motion of ABPs in regular square lattices.…”
Section: B the Physical Origin Of Topotaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand mechanisms of the durotaxis, several computational models have been developed with different phenomenological assumptions [27][28][29][30][31][32] . In most previous models, the mechanics of a substrate was not considered explicitly; cells in the models sense local stiffness imposed on the substrate somehow and change a certain property, depending on the sensed stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most previous models, the mechanics of a substrate was not considered explicitly; cells in the models sense local stiffness imposed on the substrate somehow and change a certain property, depending on the sensed stiffness. For example, it was assumed that the persistency and speed of migration 31 , cell spreading 28 , cell traction forces 30 , or adhesion strength 32 vary as a function of local substrate stiffness. Although these models succeeded to recapitulate durotactic behaviors thanks to the phenomenological assumptions, insights provided from these models are inevitably limited 4 because the models cannot explain how cells sense local stiffness and make decisions based on the sensed stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%