1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.50.4589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenological consequences of singlet neutrinos

Abstract: In this paper, we study the phenomenology of right-handed neutrino isosinglets. We consider the general situation where the neutrino masses are not necessarily given by m 2 D /M , where m D and M are the Dirac and Majorana mass terms respectively. The consequent mixing between the light and heavy neutrinos is then not suppressed, and we treat it as an independent parameter in the analysis. It turns out that µ − e conversion is an important experiment in placing limits on the heavy mass scale (M ) and the mixin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs. [11][12][13] also exhibit differences in the relative size and/or sign of the crossed and not crossed box contributions, that is, in the amplitudes resulting from the last two diagrams in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Refs. [11][12][13] also exhibit differences in the relative size and/or sign of the crossed and not crossed box contributions, that is, in the amplitudes resulting from the last two diagrams in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, below 100 MeV the absence of zero distance effects in short baseline oscillation experiments (such 10 In the low mass regime, the amplitude for µ → eγ is analogous to that for b → sγ, while those for µ → e conversion and µ → 3e exhibit only a GIM cancelation quadratic in the light masses instead of the logarithmic one for quark transitions such as b → se + e − , which are proportional to fermion electric charges inside the loop. 11 For small sterile masses above the eV , the seesaw approximation UνN ∝ Y † N v/mN ( 1) in Eq. (2.13) still holds, and an extra x −2 N factor has to be added in Eqs.…”
Section: Minimum Seesaw Scales That Future Experiments Could Probementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To show that the differences between theories with massive neutrinos and our model should not be taken too seriously, we note that there is a variant of our model where the lepton number symmetry is slightly broken and the neutrinos are given a small mass [17,18] and there are variants of see-saw models where the restriction from the ratio D 2 M N is avoided (assuming certain symmetries in the neutrino mass matrix) and possibly large mixings of NHL's arise as a result [19,20].…”
Section: Solutions To the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.30 become Dirac and Majorana n × n mass matrices) that avoid this suppression [19,20]. For instance, Pilaftsis [19] finds a relation among the elements of D and M matrices that leads to massless neutrinos at the tree-level and small Majorana masses are generated radiatively.…”
Section: A Simple Model Of Neutrino Massmentioning
confidence: 99%