1982
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.25.2278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenological and microscopic optical model analyses of the interaction of low-energy nucleons withNb93

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The microscopic imaginary term has a large central depth with almost no surface peak, while its phenomenological counterpart has a small central depth and moderate surface peak. This feature has been observed in other microscopic optical potentials calculated from nuclear matter [48][49][50][51]. To mitigate this discrepancy, some semi-microscopic optical potentials apply an energy-dependent scaling factor to the imaginary term [31,52], but in the present work we employ no such factors.…”
Section: Improved Local Density Approximationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The microscopic imaginary term has a large central depth with almost no surface peak, while its phenomenological counterpart has a small central depth and moderate surface peak. This feature has been observed in other microscopic optical potentials calculated from nuclear matter [48][49][50][51]. To mitigate this discrepancy, some semi-microscopic optical potentials apply an energy-dependent scaling factor to the imaginary term [31,52], but in the present work we employ no such factors.…”
Section: Improved Local Density Approximationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…For instance, at the scattering energy E = 35 MeV, the surface peak has essentially vanished in the microscopic calculation, and the remaining "volume" imaginary part is large compared to phenomenology. In fact, this is a common feature [4,6,60,61] in microscopic optical potentials computed in the nuclear matter approach. Modern semimicroscopic optical potentials therefore include empirical energy-dependent strength factors multiplying the real and imaginary central parts [7,9].…”
Section: Kd Globalmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…que nous avons obtenue est proche de celle r6cemment d6termin6e [19] dans 1'analyse de la diffusion 61astique de nucl6ons par 93Nb. Les facteurs de renormalisation des differents potentiels sont aussi proches de ceux ant6rieurement deduits par Lejeune et Hodgson [20] de leurs analyses de la diffusion 61astique de nucl6ons par un ensemble de noyaux (A =12 -209) a diverses energies.…”
Section: Discussion Et Conclusion -La Param6trisationunclassified
“…This leads to larger total reaction cross sections [73] compared to phenomenology and experiment. This is in fact a general feature of the microscopic nuclear matter approach [77,78] independent of the choice of nuclear potential, and previous works [74,79] have attempted to mitigate this deficiency by introducing scaling factors for the imaginary part.…”
Section: Nucleon-nucleus Optical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%