1997
DOI: 10.2307/5983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenology of Winter Moth Feeding on Common Heather: Effects of Source Population and Experimental Manipulation of Hatch Dates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larval development at harvest on 19 June 1994, was described by a development index (Kerslake & Hartley, 1997), calculated for each feeding bag as follows :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Larval development at harvest on 19 June 1994, was described by a development index (Kerslake & Hartley, 1997), calculated for each feeding bag as follows :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also agrees with the predictions of Landsberg & Smith (1992), that increasing CO # is unlikely to have a strong effect on the probability of outbreak of a generalist univoltine leaf-chewing insect such as O. brumata, particularly on a slow-growing host, rich in C-based secondary defence compounds, such as C. vulgaris. Even if it is assumed that future long-term exposure of C. vulgaris to rising CO # levels will eventually produce a small reduction in tissue N concentration (Bazzaz, 1990), it is probable that compensatory feeding will buffer O. brumata development against such a change (Watt et al, 1995 ;Kerslake & Hartley, 1997). These results imply that the O. brumata-C. vulgaris system is unlikely to respond strongly or rapidly to future changes in CO # concentrations.…”
Section: Performance Of O Brumata On Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen-enrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, variation in phenological synchrony of insects and host plant populations has been shown to affect spatial structure (Rodriguez et al 1994) and size of insect populations (Kerslake and Hartley 1997;Hunter and Elkington 2000). By contrast, the effects of variation in phenological synchrony on plant populations have rarely been examined (Russell and Louda 2004).…”
Section: Phenological Synchrony-modified Effects Of Herbivore Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence suggests that herbivore emergence does not always synchronize well with host plant phenology. Therefore, synchronization with host plant phenology is a critical event for herbivores, because a time lag in the synchronization determines the quality and quantity of available food resources and the abundance of herbivore individuals (see also Kerslake and Hartley 1997). In particular, insects primarily attacking young foliage and active early in the season are sensitive to phenological variation among plants while herbivores primarily attacking mature foliage later in the season are not (Fox et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%