2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbd.2022.101029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenology of the transcriptome coincides with the physiology of double-crested cormorant embryonic development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We detected differences in body mass among laurel and pine forest common chaffinches and we detected several genes involved in growth and body size, including apobec2 (Sato et al, 2010), cast (Zhang et al, 2012) and plppr5 (Hou et al, 2022), and genes involved in skeleton and bone formation including prr5l , (Wallace et al, 2022), cap2 (Kepser et al, 2019) and epha5 (Yamada et al, 2013). We also detected differences between both habitats in wing length, and we found as a candidate the cux1 gene, which has been shown to be involved in the regulation of joint formation in the limb development of chicks (Lizarraga et al, 2002) and is related to small wings in the flightless Galapagos cormorant (Burga et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We detected differences in body mass among laurel and pine forest common chaffinches and we detected several genes involved in growth and body size, including apobec2 (Sato et al, 2010), cast (Zhang et al, 2012) and plppr5 (Hou et al, 2022), and genes involved in skeleton and bone formation including prr5l , (Wallace et al, 2022), cap2 (Kepser et al, 2019) and epha5 (Yamada et al, 2013). We also detected differences between both habitats in wing length, and we found as a candidate the cux1 gene, which has been shown to be involved in the regulation of joint formation in the limb development of chicks (Lizarraga et al, 2002) and is related to small wings in the flightless Galapagos cormorant (Burga et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%