Phenology and canopy conductance limit the accuracy of 20 evapotranspiration models in predicting transpiration

Influence of cultivar and fertilization treatment on the yield and leaf nutrients content of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)

“…Our findings confirmed the previous statements of [ 40 ], which revealed the Ca content in leaves from the control treatment were much lower. Differences between the results of this study and the outcomes of fellow studies in terms of nutrient content could be explained by the different cultivars studied, and by environmental factors like soil type, precipitation and other hydrological and soil characteristics [ 46 , 47 ] as cultural techniques such as fertilisation, and the methodology used to determine the studied properties.…”

Optimized Pan Evaporation by Potential Evapotranspiration for Water Inflow Estimation in Ungauged Inland Plain Lake, China

“…The FAO PM equation has been widely applied to derive ET 0 [25,54,55], whose performance has been widely validated [56]. The PM equation is shown as Eq.…”

Predicting the canopy conductance to water vapor of grapevines using a biophysical model in a hot and arid climate

“…However, this method has limitations related to soil and canopy conductance measurement (Paco et al, 2006;Picoń-Toro et al, 2012;Rallo et al, 2021). Indeed, some of these limitations have been reported in the literature for sparsely planted, drip-irrigated crops, with significant exposed soil and a stringent stomatal control mechanism for water loss, such as grapevines (Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985;Campos et al, 2010;Pereira et al, 2015;Schymanski and Or, 2017;Forster et al, 2022).…”