Phenological and Physiological Changes in Adult<i>Piezodorus guildinii</i>(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Due to Variation in Photoperiod and Temperature

Zerbino, M. S.; Altier, Nora; Panizzi, Antônio R.

doi:10.1653/024.097.0255

Cited by 13 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Not much data are found in the literature on the effect of temperature on the feeding activity of Neotropical pentatomids. The red banded stink bug, Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) was reported to reduce its feeding activity with temperature decrease from 25 to 20 C in the laboratory (Zerbino et al, 2014); however, no data were found on feeding activity of stink bugs below 20 C in the neotropics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of green-belly stink bug, Dichelops furcatus (F.) on wheat yield and development

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The green belly stink bug, Dichelops furcatus (F.) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) is a pest of corn and soybean in southern Brazil. It also occurs on wheat, but information on its damage to this crop is limited. To determine the need for sustainable IPM programs, the impact of this bug on wheat production should be determined. Studies were conducted in the screenhouse with 1, 2 and 4 bugs caged for 16 days on single plants, cv. 'BRS Parrudo'. During the vegetative period (plants ca. 25 cm tall), all infestation levels significantly reduced plant height and ear head length, but did not reduce grain yield. Feeding damage caused tissue necrosis on leaves. During the booting stage, grain yield was significantly reduced with 2 and 4 bugs per plant; ear heads were small, discolored and abnormally developed. In 2013 and 2014 field trials, plants were infested for 18 days with 2, 4 and 8 bugs per m 2 at vegetative, booting, and milky grain stage. At these infestation levels, there was no significant reduction in grain yield. There was a significant decrease in the number of normal seedlings resulting from seeds exposed to 8 bugs per m 2 at the milky grain stage. Results suggest that, in general, there is no need to control D. furcatus on wheat, unless numbers are !8 bugs per m 2 during reproductive period.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of green-belly stink bug, Dichelops furcatus (F.) on wheat yield and development

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the experiments carried out at a single temperature, long-day photoperiods accelerate larval development in a number of true bugs and other insects from the Mediterranean region and other relatively warm climates (Zohdy & Abou-Elela, 1975;El-Helaly et al, 1977;Abdel-Malek et al, 1982;He, 2000;Ishihara, 2000;Mansfi eld et al, 2007;Bahşi & Tunç, 2008;Wang et al, 2013;Zerbino et al, 2014;Pazyuk & Reznik, 2016). It is worth noting, however, that all of the populations studied are multivoltine or at least bivoltine.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Convergent photoperiodic plasticity in developmental rate in two species of insects with widely different thermal phenotypes

Kutcherov¹,

Лопатина²,

Balashov³

2018

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

http://www.eje.cz tion, analysis and synthesis. At fi rst glance, the sheer variety of taxa, lifestyles, photoperiodic responses and, last but not least, experimental designs is so wide that drawing any generalizations seems challenging. Furthermore, it has long been noted that the rate-controlling effect of photoperiod may depend on other factors, especially temperature. The difference may be merely quantitative such that a particular photoperiod exerts a strong effect at one temperature and little or no effect at another (Vinogradova, 1960; Ingram & Jenner, 1976), but sometimes there is a reversal of photoperiodic effect at high temperatures relative to that in cooler conditions, e.g., acceleration versus retardation (Geispitz et al., 1971; Goryshin & Akhmedov, 1971; Lopatina et al., 2007). Due to the growing appreciation of the role of reaction norms in adaptive evolution (Schlichting & Pigliucci, 1998; Murren et al., 2014; Kivelä et al., 2015), these photoperiod-temperature interactions are currently interpreted as photoperiodic plasticity of thermal reaction norms for growth and development (Gotthard et al., 1999; Lopatina et al., 2007; Kutcherov et al., 2015). However, studies on insect growth and development at several combinations of temperature and photoperiod have also produced a patchwork of examples with nearly as Convergent photoperiodic plasticity in developmental rate in two species of insects with widely different thermal phenotypes

show abstract

“…For example, the head and pronotum widths of Halyomorpha halys (Stål) were significantly reduced under a short photophase (Niva & Takeda, ). In addition, Dolycoris baccarum (L.) and Piezodorus guildinii adults reared at 25°C under long photophase conditions were larger than those under short photophase (Nakamura, ; Zerbino et al., ). Considering that overwintering P. astrigera with large body size experience gradually decreased photoperiod and temperature, it appears that the body size of P. astrigera is not controlled by photoperiod.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In some species, the effects of temperature override photoperiod (Iida et al, 2016;Musolin et al, 2010). However, in other species, body size is significantly affected by photoperiod than by temperature (Nakamura, 2002;Niva & Takeda, 2003;Zerbino et al, 2014Zerbino et al, , 2015. The contrasting mechanisms regulating the interaction between temperature, photoperiod, and body size needs further investigation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Seasonal variations in body melanism and size of the wolf spiderPardosa astrigera(Araneae: Lycosidae)

Yang

Xiao

et al. 2018

Ecology and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Variations in species morphology and life‐history traits strongly correlate with geographic and climatic characteristics. Most studies on morphological variations in animals focus on ectotherms distributed on a large geographic scale across latitudinal and/or altitudinal gradient. However, the morphological variations of spiders living in the same habitats across different seasons have not been reported. In this study, we used the wolf spider, Pardosa astrigera, as a model to determine seasonal differences in adult body size, melanism, fecundity, and egg diameter both in the overwintering and the first generation for 2010 and 2016. The results showed that in 2010, both females and males of the overwintering generation were significantly darker than the first generation. Moreover, the overwintering females were markedly larger and produced more and bigger eggs than the first generation in both 2010 and 2016. Considering the overwintering P. astrigera experiencing low temperature and/or desiccation stress, these results suggest that substantially darker and larger body of the overwintering generation is adaptive to adverse conditions.

show abstract

Phenological and Physiological Changes in AdultPiezodorus guildinii(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Due to Variation in Photoperiod and Temperature

Cited by 13 publications

References 34 publications

Effect of green-belly stink bug, Dichelops furcatus (F.) on wheat yield and development

Effect of green-belly stink bug, Dichelops furcatus (F.) on wheat yield and development

Convergent photoperiodic plasticity in developmental rate in two species of insects with widely different thermal phenotypes

Seasonal variations in body melanism and size of the wolf spiderPardosa astrigera(Araneae: Lycosidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About