2018
DOI: 10.1177/1082013218797527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenolic content and some physical properties of dried broccoli as affected by drying method

Abstract: Broccoli samples ( Brassica oleracea) with an initial moisture content of 82.87% (wb) were dried using microwave technology (18, 36, and 54 W/g). Convective drying was used as a control group. The dependent variables investigated in the study were phenolic content, color, rehydration capacity, and microstructure of broccoli samples. Moreover, the best fitting thin layer model to the experimental moisture ratio was determined. The phenolic contents were found as 892.4, 740.6, and 759.8 mg gallic acid/100 g dry … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following characterization methods were used in this study: rehydration capacity (Quintero-Ramos et al 1992), shrinkage capacity (Yilmaz et al 2018), relative reconstitution capacity (Fathima et al 2001), dehydration and rehydration ratio (Sheshma and Raj 2014), bulk density (Stojceska et al 2008), tapped density (Narayana and Narasinga Rao 1984), flowability and cohesiveness (Jinapong et al 2008), titratable acidity (Ranganna 2017), total soluble solids (TSS; Kathiravan et al 2014), color (Hunter Lab 2013), chroma and hue (Pathare et al 2012), total color difference (Martins and Silva 2002), water solubility and water absorption index (WAI; Anderson et al 1969), waterretention and oil-retention capacities (Beugre et al 2014), hydrophilic lipophilic index (Njintang et al 2001), and water activity (Abramovie et al 2008).…”
Section: Physical-functional Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following characterization methods were used in this study: rehydration capacity (Quintero-Ramos et al 1992), shrinkage capacity (Yilmaz et al 2018), relative reconstitution capacity (Fathima et al 2001), dehydration and rehydration ratio (Sheshma and Raj 2014), bulk density (Stojceska et al 2008), tapped density (Narayana and Narasinga Rao 1984), flowability and cohesiveness (Jinapong et al 2008), titratable acidity (Ranganna 2017), total soluble solids (TSS; Kathiravan et al 2014), color (Hunter Lab 2013), chroma and hue (Pathare et al 2012), total color difference (Martins and Silva 2002), water solubility and water absorption index (WAI; Anderson et al 1969), waterretention and oil-retention capacities (Beugre et al 2014), hydrophilic lipophilic index (Njintang et al 2001), and water activity (Abramovie et al 2008).…”
Section: Physical-functional Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekstraksiyon işlemine başlamadan önce örnek çözgen oranının belirlenebilmesi için sarı kantaron ve ıtır ham maddelerinin nem miktarları infrared nem tayin cihazı (MA150, Sartorius, Germany) ile belirlenmiştir [23].…”
Section: Nem Miktarının Belirlenmesiunclassified
“…where Mt, M0 and Me are moisture content at any time of drying (kg water/ kg dry matter), initial moisture content (kg water/ kg dry matter) and equilibrium moisture content (kg water/ kg dry matter), respectively. The Me was neglected since its values are relatively small compared to Mt and Mo [18][19].…”
Section: Modelling Of Drying Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where MRexp,i is experimental moisture ratio, MRpre,i is predicted moisture ratio, N is the number of observations, Z is the number of constants. The model that best describe the drying characteristics was chosen as the one with the highest R 2 , followed by the least χ 2 and RMSE values [19,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%