2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenolic compounds profile of water and ethanol extracts of Euphorbia hirta L. leaves showing antioxidant and antifungal properties

Abstract: 1The bioactive chemical constituents of water and ethanol extracts of Euphorbia hirta L. leaves have 2 been identified and quantified using an un-targeted mass spectrometric approach. The study allowed 3 the tentative identification of 123 individual phenolic compounds and 18 non-phenolic 4 phytochemicals, most of them described in Euphorbia hirta L. leaves for the first time. 5 Gallotannins, hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids were the most abundant phenolic classes 6 in Euphorbia hirta L. leaves, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separation was performed with a C18 column (HxSil C18 Reversed phaseHamilton, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, Hamilton Company, Reno, NV, USA) by using a binary gradient of water/formic acid and acetonitrile. The mobile phase composition, the flow rate, the elution gradient, the negative and positive ESI-MS parameters as well as the quantification method are fully described in Martini et al [ 24 , 29 ] and Mekam et al [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation was performed with a C18 column (HxSil C18 Reversed phaseHamilton, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, Hamilton Company, Reno, NV, USA) by using a binary gradient of water/formic acid and acetonitrile. The mobile phase composition, the flow rate, the elution gradient, the negative and positive ESI-MS parameters as well as the quantification method are fully described in Martini et al [ 24 , 29 ] and Mekam et al [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical structures of all E. hirta phytochemicals and the control samples (positive and negative) used in molecular docking can be found in the Supplementary Materials. In total, 298 phytochemical Benzenoids/benzene and substituted derivatives 1-(3-aminophenyl)ethanol (Rautela et al,2020) C 8 H 11 NO −4.6 1 -O-butyl 2-O-tetradecyl benzene-1,2-dicarboxylate (Ogunlesi et al,2009) C 26 H 42 O 4 −4.9 benzoic acid (Ali et al,2020) C 7 H 6 O 2 −4.5 benzamide, 3-fluoro-N-butyl-N-ethyl (Rautela et al,2020) C 13 H 18 FNO −4.9 gallic acid (Bach et al,2020;Linfang et al, 2012;Mahomoodally et al,2020;Mekam et al,2019, Suganthi andRavi, 2018;Wu et al,2012) C 7 H 6 O 5 −5.5 ethyl gallate (Mekam et al,2019) C 9 H 10 O 5 −5.7 methyl gallate (Mahomoodally et al,2020) C 8 H 8 O 5 −5.6 protocatechuic acid (Mahomoodally et al,2020) C 7 H 6 O 4 −5.4 1-(3-ethoxyphenyl)propan-2-one (Rautela et al,2020) C 11 H 14 O 2 −5.0 methyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoate (Perumal and Mahmud, 2013) C 18 H 28 O 3 −6.5 Benzenoid/naphthalene [6-(4-cyanophenyl)naphthalen-2-yl] hexanoate (Rautela et al,2020) C 23 H 21 NO 2 −6.5 Benzenoids/phenols benzene-1,2,3-triol (Karki et al,2019) C 6 H 6 O 3 −4.9 2-tert-butyl-4-methoxyphenol (Rautela et al,2020) C 11 H 16 O 2 −5.1 4-ethenyl-2-methoxyphenol (Rautela et al,2020) C 9 H 10 O 2 −4.7 Benzenoid 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid diisooctyl ester (Ogunlesi et al,2009) C 24 H 38 O 4 −5.4 Hydrocarbon/saturated hydrocarbon Tetradecane (Ogunlesi et al,2009) C 14 H 30 −4.2 Hydrocarbon/unsaturated hydrocarbon (E)-pentatriacont-17-ene (Rautela et al,2020) C 35 H 70 −4.4 Lignans, neolignans, and related compounds/aryltetralin lignans Isolintetralin (Zhang et al,2020) C 23 H 28 O 6 −7.1 Lintetralin (Zhang et al,2020) C 23 H 28 O 6 −7.3 Phyltetralin (Zhang et al,2020) C 24 H 32 O 6 −7.0 Hypophyllanthin (Zhang et al,2020) C 24 H 30 O 7 −6.9 Lignans, neolignans, and related compounds/dibenzylbutane lignans Niranthin (Zhang et al,2020) C 24 H 32 O 7 −6.3 5-demethox...…”
Section: Phytochemical Mining and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two phenolic acids were identified only in leaf extracts. Thus, peak 19 gave a molecular formula C 27 H 24 O 18 and revealed an MS/MS fragment at 169 allowing its identification as trigalloyl‐glucose which was previously identified in Malpighiales order [13] . Peak 48 was identified as pyrogallol A since it showed a molecular formula C 12 H 12 O 6 and it was previously found in Phyllanthaceae family [14] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%