2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(16)30234-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PHENIX Collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
105
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 one finds that the value of S 0 corresponds to a freeze-out temperature of 153.5(2.0) MeV. This temperature range is consistent with an earlier determination of the freeze-out temperature that was based on a comparison of the mean over variance ratio of net electric-charge and net proton-number ratios obtained by the STAR and PHENIX Collaborations [29,30] with corresponding lattice QCD calculations for net electric-charge and net baryon-number cumulant ratios [31]. We also note that the ratio of the curvature of R B 42 and R B 31 on the pseudo-critical (freeze-out) line tends to be larger than 3, which also has been noted in our previous analysis of skewness and kurtosis ratios [19].…”
Section: Baryon-number Fluctuations On the Pseudo-critical Line Asupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 one finds that the value of S 0 corresponds to a freeze-out temperature of 153.5(2.0) MeV. This temperature range is consistent with an earlier determination of the freeze-out temperature that was based on a comparison of the mean over variance ratio of net electric-charge and net proton-number ratios obtained by the STAR and PHENIX Collaborations [29,30] with corresponding lattice QCD calculations for net electric-charge and net baryon-number cumulant ratios [31]. We also note that the ratio of the curvature of R B 42 and R B 31 on the pseudo-critical (freeze-out) line tends to be larger than 3, which also has been noted in our previous analysis of skewness and kurtosis ratios [19].…”
Section: Baryon-number Fluctuations On the Pseudo-critical Line Asupporting
confidence: 88%
“…10 thus may be considered only as a starting point for a more refined analysis of the experimental data that may take into account effects arising from experimental acceptance cuts, the small size of the hot and dense medium, non-equilibrium effects etc. 6 Statistics at √ s N N = 54.4 GeV is a factor 3.4 larger than at √ s N N = 200 GeV and a factor (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) larger than at the other √ s N N data sets shown in Fig. 10.…”
Section: Baryon-number Fluctuations On the Pseudo-critical Line Amentioning
confidence: 78%
“…14 In this section we investigate the possible role of nucleon substructure in flow signature of 16 O + 16 O collisions. We compare the predictions of the wounded nucleon model and the wounded parton (wounded quark) model [55][56][57][58] with three constituents, which has turned out successful phenomenologically in explaining the RHIC and LHC data [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. The wounded parton picture is implemented in GLISSANDO 3 [18] by placing three partons around the center of each nucleon with an appropriate exponential distribution.…”
Section: Glauber Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the experimental side, heavy ion collisions at various collision energies and several system sizes are carried out in order to probe a wide range in both temperature and baryon chemical potential. Those include the beam energy scan performed at RHIC [7,8,9] and the CERN-SPS [10,11,12]. In the future, this region will be studied further by CBM at FAIR and at NICA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%