2018
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2017.2783099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasor Estimation Algorithm Based on Complex Frequency Filters for Digital Relaying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in which ∆t is the sampling interval and is equal to 1/ f s (where f s is the sampling frequency), n denotes the sample number, and E ∆ = e −∆t/τ , called the damping factor, depends on the DDC time constant [4]. It is difficult to predetermine the DDC parameters as they depend on fault characteristics, such as, fault inception time/angle, fault location, and fault resistance [4][5][6]31]. However, their presence (usually in the current signals) can cause up to 15% error in the estimated phasor [31].…”
Section: Proposed Filter For Ddc Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in which ∆t is the sampling interval and is equal to 1/ f s (where f s is the sampling frequency), n denotes the sample number, and E ∆ = e −∆t/τ , called the damping factor, depends on the DDC time constant [4]. It is difficult to predetermine the DDC parameters as they depend on fault characteristics, such as, fault inception time/angle, fault location, and fault resistance [4][5][6]31]. However, their presence (usually in the current signals) can cause up to 15% error in the estimated phasor [31].…”
Section: Proposed Filter For Ddc Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the relevance of the measurements obtained from these devices for monitoring, protection, and control applications, it is necessary that the estimation algorithms used in them are accurate, robust against stray components, computationally efficient, and have low response time [1,2]. Hence, digital signal processing techniques such as discrete Fourier transform (DFT) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], least squares (LS) [12][13][14][15], maximum likelihood [16], space vector transform [17], artificial neural networks [18], Hilbert transform [19], Stockwell transform [20], matrix pencil method [21], Kalman filters [22,23], subspace-based methods [24,25], and filter-based methods [26,27] have been proposed recently to estimate phasor and/or frequency under different operating conditions. However, many of the techniques mentioned above suffer from long response time during switching transients [9,13,20], high computational complexity [7,21,24], susceptibility to grid disturbances [12,18,22] and noise [19], lengthy observation window [7,10,11,[25]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can be divided into the frequency domain and time domain algorithms. DFT (Discrete Fourier transform)-based methods [1] [2] [3] are well-known techniques for spectrum analysis of grid signal in the frequency domain. However, these techniques often assume that the grid voltage waveform is periodic and repetitive, which may lead to spectrum leakage problem due to the unsynchronized sampling effect, giving rise to errors in frequency and phase angle detection [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to conventional methods, the most used is the differential protection (87T) based on phasors [4]. Generally, this protection has integrated an improvement to correctly differentiate internal faults from inrush currents based on the harmonic content of the differential current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%