2022
DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasing Out Fossil Fuels: Determinants of Production Cuts and Implications for an International Agreement

Abstract: Fossil fuel producers have a major role to play in curbing greenhouse gas emissions through supply-side initiatives. Yet, no study has systematically assessed the determinants of efforts to constrain fossil fuel production for climate purposes. This article develops a conceptual framework for factors potentially affecting country-level initiatives to keep fossil fuels in the ground. Using data for 124 countries with fossil fuel reserves for 2006–2019 and multivariate Poisson regression analysis, we identify fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grassroots movements are often the first to propose especially moratorium proposals, but also other supply-side initiatives, such as divestment campaigns (Van Asselt and Newell, 2022). If adopted as state policy, divestments, extraction and carbon taxes and subsidy phaseouts (Lujala et al, 2022; van Asselt and Newell, 2022) can all be conceptualised as resulting from a condensation of conflicts of interests within the state reflecting socio-political struggles. Such an understanding can be useful for contextual analyses of supply-side climate policies, as it can help explain first why some proposals are adopted into state policy, second how their policy design is an outcome of attempts to appease different conflicting interests and third the resulting state (spatial) strategies.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grassroots movements are often the first to propose especially moratorium proposals, but also other supply-side initiatives, such as divestment campaigns (Van Asselt and Newell, 2022). If adopted as state policy, divestments, extraction and carbon taxes and subsidy phaseouts (Lujala et al, 2022; van Asselt and Newell, 2022) can all be conceptualised as resulting from a condensation of conflicts of interests within the state reflecting socio-political struggles. Such an understanding can be useful for contextual analyses of supply-side climate policies, as it can help explain first why some proposals are adopted into state policy, second how their policy design is an outcome of attempts to appease different conflicting interests and third the resulting state (spatial) strategies.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global irreversible, long-term trend for increase in energy consumption [3,4] requires new energy sources [5,6] in order to guarantee energy security with simultaneous environmental sustainability [7,8]. The dynamic growth of solar energy, hydro, and wind which are strongly affected by weather/season conditions [9] is still insufficient to phase out fossil fuels [10,11]. As a result, new energy materials are required, whose availability is independent from season or geographic, location, or climate conditions [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%