1980
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1980.49.4.609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasic vagal influence on inspiratory motor output in anesthetized human subjects

Abstract: Vagal influence on inspiratory motor output was assessed in 20 normal subjects and in 12 patients with respiratory disorders under enflurane anethesia using the method of airway occlusion. The change in inspiratory duration during occlusion (delta TI) was measured from mechanical parameters (respiratory flow and tracheal pressure). In eight of the subjects, however, the effect of occlusion and augmentation of tidal volume was further evaluated from diaphragmatic electromyogram. In normal subjects delta TI (mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the magnitude of the increase in intrinsic tongue muscle EMG activities as a result of airway occlusion at end-expiration was significantly greater in mild hypoxia compared with the control gas condition (i.e., as shown in Figure 3). The extent to which such vagal influences may be expected to affect tongue muscle activities in human subjects is less clear, however, for although humans have functioning pulmonary stretch receptors, during quiet breathing their activity is believed to have little or no influence on inspiratory motor output (28,29). Nevertheless, this is an important observation because it may indicate a preferential, lung inflation-mediated suppression of intrinsic versus extrinsic tongue muscle activities when the drive to breathe increases, such as in mild hypoxia or hypercapnia.…”
Section: Influence Of Airway Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the magnitude of the increase in intrinsic tongue muscle EMG activities as a result of airway occlusion at end-expiration was significantly greater in mild hypoxia compared with the control gas condition (i.e., as shown in Figure 3). The extent to which such vagal influences may be expected to affect tongue muscle activities in human subjects is less clear, however, for although humans have functioning pulmonary stretch receptors, during quiet breathing their activity is believed to have little or no influence on inspiratory motor output (28,29). Nevertheless, this is an important observation because it may indicate a preferential, lung inflation-mediated suppression of intrinsic versus extrinsic tongue muscle activities when the drive to breathe increases, such as in mild hypoxia or hypercapnia.…”
Section: Influence Of Airway Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the relati ve importance of vagal influences on breathing in human s remains a topic of debate, the classic respon ses referred to as Breuer-Hering (BH) reflexes have been well described in humans. These include Vr-dependent variations in inspiratory time (6) and apnea or prolongation of expiration following a single lung inflation (5,7). BH reflexes can be abolished by vagal blockade (5) and are absent in patients with lungs that are vagally denervated through transplantation (7).…”
Section: The Effect Of Volume-related Feedback On Respiratory Rate Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single lung inflations have been shown to prolong expiration in sleeping or anesthetized humans (5)(6)(7). We hypothesized that large lung inflations delivered during mechanical ventilation would also prolong expiration and consequently slow the rate of breathing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THE HERING-BREUER REFLEX, in which passive overinflation of the lungs or prevention of inspiration or expiration alters respiratory timing (11), has been documented in humans by using airway occlusion during anesthesia (19) or passive overinflation of the lungs during sleep (12). The reflex has been more difficult to elicit during wakefulness in humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%