1979
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.45.5.595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasic effects of vagal stimulation on pacemaker activity of the isolated sinus node of the young cat.

Abstract: SUMMARYWe studied the functional interactions between the sinoatrial (SA) nodal pacemaker and the vagus nerve in isolated right atrium-vagus nerve preparations of the kitten. Brief trains of stimuli applied to the vagus nerve scanning the spontaneous pacemaker cycle induce a brief hyperpolarization of the membrane of cells in the pacemaker region. Aa a result of this hyperpolarization, there occur phasic changes in pacemaker cycle length that depend on the timing, amplitude, and duration of the hyperpolarizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
43
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To terminate the pulse, the opening rate coefficient, « u , was set to zero. This technique produced a membrane hyperpolarization similar in shape and time course to that seen experimentally (Jalife and Moe, 1979;Jalife et al, 1980). With different versions of the computer programs, three simulation protocols were used: (1) the application of a single, brief ACh pulse, (2) the repetitive application of brief ACh pulses at fixed ACh inter-pulse intervals, and (3) the repetitive application of brief ACh pulses at fixed sinus response-ACh pulse intervals (i.e., fixed coupling).…”
Section: Perturbations Of Pacemaker Activitysupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To terminate the pulse, the opening rate coefficient, « u , was set to zero. This technique produced a membrane hyperpolarization similar in shape and time course to that seen experimentally (Jalife and Moe, 1979;Jalife et al, 1980). With different versions of the computer programs, three simulation protocols were used: (1) the application of a single, brief ACh pulse, (2) the repetitive application of brief ACh pulses at fixed ACh inter-pulse intervals, and (3) the repetitive application of brief ACh pulses at fixed sinus response-ACh pulse intervals (i.e., fixed coupling).…”
Section: Perturbations Of Pacemaker Activitysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Brief efferent vagal bursts, such as those induced reflexly by the systolic pulse wave (Iriuchijima and Kumada, 1963) or respiratory activity (Anrep et al, 1936), can either abbreviate or prolong the sinus pacemaker cycle (Levy et al, , 1972Spear et al, 1979;Stuesse et al, 1981;. The magnitude and direction of the effect depend upon the intrinsic pacemaker period (cycle length), the intensity and duration of the vagal stimulus, and, most important, the time of occurrence of the vagal pulse during the pacemaker cycle Jalife and Moe, 1979). Previous studies from our laboratory have investigated the nature of dynamic vagus-SA node interactions for singly and repetitively applied vagal pulses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A). In the baroreflex, the efferent cardiac vagal activity occurs more or less fixed to the cardiac cycle (Jewett, 1964;Katona et al, 1970), and the effectiveness of vagal activity on the sinus automaticity is strongly dependent on the relationship between the pacemaker cycle and the duration, amplitude, and timing of the hyperpolarizing effect of vagal impulses (Jalife and Moe, 1979). K ACh channels possess a sufficiently fast response time to ACh to mediate such a phasic effect of vagal activity (Breitwieser and Szabo, 1988;Inomata et al, 1989), at least in part due to the direct coupling of the channels with G proteins and the regulator of G protein signaling proteins (Doupnik et al, 1997;Yamada et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Sympathetic actions may be ignored because they are too slow to mediate reflex changes with a 0-to 2-beat delay (9,21,34,55)]. It is well established that there is a fixed latency imposed by vagal neuroeffector transmission at the cardiac pacemaker (6,21,23). This is due to the time taken between the occupation by acetylcholine of postjunctional M 2 muscarinc receptors and the changes in pacemaker cell currents mediated by G protein-coupled signaling pathways (12).…”
Section: Clonidine and The Cardiac Baroreflexmentioning
confidence: 99%