2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-28526-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasenmodell der Intervision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on Luhmann's scholarly legacy, Stefan Kühl argues that most Germans' silence to the Nazi's antisemitic legal assault generated an antisemitic "fictional consensus…" 163 This antisemitic fictional consensus was the false perception among most Germans that-because Goebbels flooded the media with images of massive crowds of Germans captivated by Hitler's every word 164 -the Nazi's racial policies must have been unanimously popular. The perception surrounding the popularity of the Nazi's discriminatory policies also had a powerful controlling influence on most German's everyday social interactions.…”
Section: The Change From Conventional Positive To Radical Negative Eumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on Luhmann's scholarly legacy, Stefan Kühl argues that most Germans' silence to the Nazi's antisemitic legal assault generated an antisemitic "fictional consensus…" 163 This antisemitic fictional consensus was the false perception among most Germans that-because Goebbels flooded the media with images of massive crowds of Germans captivated by Hitler's every word 164 -the Nazi's racial policies must have been unanimously popular. The perception surrounding the popularity of the Nazi's discriminatory policies also had a powerful controlling influence on most German's everyday social interactions.…”
Section: The Change From Conventional Positive To Radical Negative Eumentioning
confidence: 99%