2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phased polyploid genomes provide deeper insight into the multiple origins of domesticated Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it should also be noted that in Kluyveromyces lactis, no real variability in terms of ploidy was observed, and aneuploidies and CNVs are not predominant. This observation contrasts with other yeast species that have undergone domestication processes, in particular with Kluyveromyces marxianus, for which ploidy variation separates the dairy and non-dairy strains (Ortiz-Merino et al, 2018), but also S. cerevisiae for which some domesticated populations, such as the beer isolates, have been described as having a higher ploidy level Saada et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it should also be noted that in Kluyveromyces lactis, no real variability in terms of ploidy was observed, and aneuploidies and CNVs are not predominant. This observation contrasts with other yeast species that have undergone domestication processes, in particular with Kluyveromyces marxianus, for which ploidy variation separates the dairy and non-dairy strains (Ortiz-Merino et al, 2018), but also S. cerevisiae for which some domesticated populations, such as the beer isolates, have been described as having a higher ploidy level Saada et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, the exploration of thousands of complete genomes over the past decade provide evidence for various independent and lineage-specific domestication events within this species, leading to different evolutionary trajectories (Duan et al, 2018; Gallone et al, 2016; Peter et al, 2018; Strope et al, 2015). The beer and bakery populations have been shown to be polyphyletic and diverse at the nucleotide and ploidy level, for example (Bigey et al, 2021; Gallone et al, 2016; Peter, De Chiara, et al, 2018; Saada et al, 2022). In contrast, the wine and sake populations are monophyletic and much less genetically diverse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1g, Additional file 2: Table S2 and S3) [24]. These eight different organisms are Arabidopsis thaliana [25,26], Caenorhabditis elegans [27], Gallus gallus (chicken), Drosophila melanogaster [28], Mus musculus (mouse) [29,30], Saccharomyces cerevisiae [31], Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and Danio rerio (zebrafish) [32,33] which are all widely studied and have high-quality reference genomes. At the telomeres, these organisms are known to have (TTA GGG ) n telomeric repeats as humans do (chicken, zebrafish, mouse) [34][35][36], (TTT AGG G) n repeats (A. thaliana) [37], (TG 1-3 ) n repeats (S. cerevisiae) [38], TTAC(A)(C)G 2-8 (S. pombe) [39], (TTA GGC ) n repeats (C. elegans) [40], or retrotransposons (D. melanogaster) [41] (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full list of the datasets used in this study is as indicated in Additional file 2: Table S2. Specifically, runs for each of the following organisms were analyzed: A. thaliana (SRR14474199, SRR16149191) [25,26], C. elegans (SRR15993157, SRR16936857) [27], Chicken (SRR15420785, SRR15420786, SRR15420787, SRR15421342 to SRR15421346), D. melanogaster (SRR15107931 to SRR15107934, SRR15107937) [28], Mouse (SRR11606870, SRR14685232, SRR14685224 to SRR14685243) [29,30], S. cerevisiae (ERR6318522, ERR6318523) [31], S. pombe (SRR17382753, SRR18210325), and Zebrafish (SRR17257555, SRR15037325) [32,33].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Repeat Calling Errors In Model Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No survey has focused on LOH accumulation and its potential variability in natural isolates showing different ploidy levels. Natural S. cerevisiae isolates are mainly diploid, but polyploid isolates (3-5n) are frequent and enriched in specific subpopulations such as the beer clade (Gallone et al, 2016; Saada et al, 2022). In addition, other yeast species (such as C. neoformans and C. albicans ) are predominantly polyploids and LOH events are widespread (up to 20% of the genome) (Abbey et al, 2014; Feldmesser et al, 2000; Mba et al, 2022; Selmecki et al, 2010; Smith and Hickman, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%