2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2018.8378686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phased array radar cost reduction through the use of commercial RF systems on a chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible benefits provided by the use of RFSoC devices to phased array radar digitisation and processing is starting to be recognised. Fagan et al [10] report on a project which had early access to RFSoC and paired it with a 64 element S-band phased array antenna. The S-band antenna outputs were down-mixed due to the pre-production RFSoC having much lower sample rates than are available in the current commercial versions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible benefits provided by the use of RFSoC devices to phased array radar digitisation and processing is starting to be recognised. Fagan et al [10] report on a project which had early access to RFSoC and paired it with a 64 element S-band phased array antenna. The S-band antenna outputs were down-mixed due to the pre-production RFSoC having much lower sample rates than are available in the current commercial versions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination is a real enabler for many different devices and has therefore seen its rise in interest from the RF sensing research and development community. For example, the RFSoC was proposed as a suitable digital back-end solution for an active radar within [7]. Its advanced capabilities come at the cost of added complexity and challenging requirements on the broad range of technical skills required to develop on the RFSoC compared to some other solutions which provide template or simpler interfaces in order to control and develop on them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By integrating the converters inside the SoC, it is possible to avoid this interface, improving power consumption and reducing the component footprint. For instance, Vivekanandan, et al [29] reported a footprint reduction of 50% and power reduction of 75% while Fagan, et al [30] showed a 6× power improvement when adopting the RFSoC over traditional FPGA and analog-todigital converter (ADC) typologies. The improvement in power consumption and footprint from combining the data converters with an FPGA and SoC enables higher operating frequencies for phased-array systems due to a smaller achievable lattice, previously precluded by the prohibitively high thermal and component densities of the distributed architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is especially evident, as traditional analog up/down conversion circuits are not needed for radar systems in the S-band owing to the multigigasample RF data converters, which enable direct sampling of incident waveforms. Other researchers have been exploring RFSoC technology for next-generation radar applications, and recent breakthroughs include bistatic radar [31], phased-array cost reduction [30], data reduction for digital apertures [5], near-field calibration [2], real-time signal generation [32], or fully digital radar system development [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%