“…This occupation number also agrees well with the XPS spectroscopy data, a photoelectron spectroscopy measurement, a DMFT calculation ( n f ∼ 1) with non-crossing approximation (NCA) impurity solver, a linear muffin-tin orbit (LMTO) + DMFT (LMTO + DMFT) calculation at T = 300 K ( n f = 1.008), and a self-interaction-corrected local spin density approximation (SIC-LSDA) calculation, suggesting the localized (atomic-like) 4f 1 configuration for Ce ions at ambient pressure and transforming into a delocalized phase under high pressure . In fact, previous experimental observation and first principles calculations both suggest that the valence (or the electron occupation number) change might not be directly from an integer to another integer, but rather to an intermediate valence upon the applied pressure. , In contrast to the valence fluctuation of CeN, the localized 4f state in CeAs (B1-type structure) demonstrates that except for the applied pressure, the p–f mixing behavior, the nearly energetically degenerate f 0 and f 1 configurations, and the electron transition f 0 d 1 ↔ f 1 d 0 have a marginal effect on the localization and occupation number of Ce 4f electrons, namely, the latter electronic mechanisms do not induce Ce 4f electrons to turn into an intermediate configuration or a mixed-valence state. Experimentally, the intensity ratio of Ce 4+ (4f 0 )/Ce 3+ (4f 1 ) + Ce 2+ (4f 2 ) XPS peaks is proportional to the amplitude of Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ states, and the localized regime in CeAs (B1-type structure) could be attributable to the screening of core holes by Ce 4f electrons.…”