2013
DOI: 10.1116/1.4816940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase transition of In/Si(111)-4×1 surface studied with low-energy electron diffraction

Abstract: The structural phase transition of an In/Si(111) surface was examined by low-energy electron diffraction (LEED). The transition temperature between the room-temperature 4×1 structure and low-temperature 8×2 structure was determined from the changes in the LEED intensity of the half-order (×2), eighth-order (8×), and fourth-order (4×) spots with temperature. The transition temperatures determined independently from three sets of LEED beam spots were within 1 K. The differently prepared In/Si(111)−4×1 surfaces, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation agrees well with a previous study reporting the hysteresis in the 4 × 1-to-8 × 2 transition and thus proving that the transition was first-order [27]. Figure 1(b) further shows that similar hysteresis is also observable for the 4× spots as the intensity is changed conversely to the superstructure diffraction [28]. The structural phase transition between the 4 × 1 and the 8 × 2 phases was reported to be influenced significantly by impurities at the surface [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Experimentalssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation agrees well with a previous study reporting the hysteresis in the 4 × 1-to-8 × 2 transition and thus proving that the transition was first-order [27]. Figure 1(b) further shows that similar hysteresis is also observable for the 4× spots as the intensity is changed conversely to the superstructure diffraction [28]. The structural phase transition between the 4 × 1 and the 8 × 2 phases was reported to be influenced significantly by impurities at the surface [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Experimentalssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the n-type substrates possessing low carrier concentrations (n1 and n2), T c was approximately 125 K, which is consistent with the values reported in previous studies (120-135 K) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In contrast, T c decreased to 115 K on the n3 and n4 substrates with intermediate carrier concentrations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The deduced values of T c are indicated by the dashed lines in figure 2. No significant difference in the T c values was observed between the '8×' spots and '×2' stripes for each substrate, as reported previously [2,11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations