2002
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v7-115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Transition for the Frog Model

Abstract: We study a system of simple random walks on graphs, known as frog model. This model can be described as follows: There are active and sleeping particles living on some graph G. Each active particle performs a simple random walk with discrete time and at each moment it may disappear with probability 1 − p. When an active particle hits a sleeping particle, the latter becomes active. Phase transition results and asymptotic values for critical parameters are presented for Z d and regular trees.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
68
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, if D A = D B then there exists a constant C 2 > 0 such that for each constant K > 0 and for sufficiently large t [17]. These two theorems suggests that a "shape theorem" may hold: t −1 B(t) converges to a non-random set B 0 which implies that the growth rate of B(t) is linear in t. Note that when D A = 0 which implies that susceptible particles do not move, the model degenerates to what is known as the frog model [3]. In this case there exists a full shape theorem, as follows: ∃ a non random set B 0 such that for all 0 < ε < 1…”
Section: Epidemics On Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if D A = D B then there exists a constant C 2 > 0 such that for each constant K > 0 and for sufficiently large t [17]. These two theorems suggests that a "shape theorem" may hold: t −1 B(t) converges to a non-random set B 0 which implies that the growth rate of B(t) is linear in t. Note that when D A = 0 which implies that susceptible particles do not move, the model degenerates to what is known as the frog model [3]. In this case there exists a full shape theorem, as follows: ∃ a non random set B 0 such that for all 0 < ε < 1…”
Section: Epidemics On Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local survival is nontrivial unless l n = 1/2 for some n ∈ N. In order to understand what the difficulties one encounters are, think of the case where all particles drift to the right (we refer to this situation as the right drift case): infinite activation is guaranteed but local survival is not. Theorem 2.1 (1) states that, in this case, the probability of local survival obeys a 0-1 law. Roughly speaking (see Corollary 2.2) in the right drift case, if l n ↑ 1 2 sufficiently fast, then we have almost sure local survival, otherwise we have local extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Whenever an active particle hits a vertex containing a sleeping one, the latter is activated, and starts its own life and trajectory on G, in an independent manner. We denote by FM(G, p) the frog model on G, with survival parameter p, referring the reader to Alves et al [1] for the formal definition of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%