1987
DOI: 10.1116/1.574182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase transformations of the H/W(110) and H/Mo(110) surfaces

Abstract: We present results of combined theoretical and experimental studies of the surface phases produced by hydrogen adsorption on tungsten (110) and molybdenum (110) planes. We have formulated a theoretical model which has the following ingredients: (1) a possible adsorbate-induced lateral shift reconstruction of the substrate surface; (2) two-body and three-body interactions among hydrogen atoms; and (3) a coupling of the overlayer ordering to the substrate reconstruction. This model gives good agreement with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This scenario can be rejected because the diffusion barrier is as high as 0.31 eV in our study. The superstructure LEED pattern formed by hydrogen atoms on this surface is destroyed above 300 K [14]. This result supports our result that the diffusion barrier is as small as 0.05 eV.…”
Section: Hydrogen Diffusion and Delocalization On W(1 1 0)supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This scenario can be rejected because the diffusion barrier is as high as 0.31 eV in our study. The superstructure LEED pattern formed by hydrogen atoms on this surface is destroyed above 300 K [14]. This result supports our result that the diffusion barrier is as small as 0.05 eV.…”
Section: Hydrogen Diffusion and Delocalization On W(1 1 0)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…At both h = 0.5 and h = 0.75, the TF site is the most stable. The site conversion proposed by previous experiments was not found [13][14][15]. The relative adsorption energy is slightly different from that for h = 1.0.…”
Section: H Adsorption On the W(1 1 0) Surfacecontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The [110]-offset from the long-bridge position is y H = 0.55 ± 0.01Å. Within the computational error the hydrogen relaxes exactly in the geometric threefold site and there is no theoretical evidence for a pronounced top-layer-shift reconstruction in agreement with the lowenergy electron diffraction experiments [21]. In comparison both bridge positions are clearly energetically unfavorable, and the on-top position is even worse.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%