2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.064410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase separation in paramagnetic Eu0.6La0.4xSrx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) Intense lines, corresponding to Griffiths phase similar to those observed in the samples with x ¼0.03 and 0.06, were observed along with the paramagnetic lines at lower fields over a wide temperature range, up to room temperature. This behavior is similar to that, observed for EPR signal in the paramagnetic phase in Eu 0.6 La 0.4 À x Sr x MnO 3 [18] for samples with x from x ¼0.13 to x¼0.2. Paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases should co-exist in this sample To this end, it is argued in [18] that possibly the magnetic Eu 3 þ ions favor a stabilization of ferromagnetic state in Eu 0.6 La 0.4 À x Sr x MnO 3 , and thus increase the intensity of EPR signals due to Griffiths phase signals over a wide temperature region.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) Intense lines, corresponding to Griffiths phase similar to those observed in the samples with x ¼0.03 and 0.06, were observed along with the paramagnetic lines at lower fields over a wide temperature range, up to room temperature. This behavior is similar to that, observed for EPR signal in the paramagnetic phase in Eu 0.6 La 0.4 À x Sr x MnO 3 [18] for samples with x from x ¼0.13 to x¼0.2. Paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases should co-exist in this sample To this end, it is argued in [18] that possibly the magnetic Eu 3 þ ions favor a stabilization of ferromagnetic state in Eu 0.6 La 0.4 À x Sr x MnO 3 , and thus increase the intensity of EPR signals due to Griffiths phase signals over a wide temperature region.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 87%
“…This behavior is similar to that, observed for EPR signal in the paramagnetic phase in Eu 0.6 La 0.4 À x Sr x MnO 3 [18] for samples with x from x ¼0.13 to x¼0.2. Paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases should co-exist in this sample To this end, it is argued in [18] that possibly the magnetic Eu 3 þ ions favor a stabilization of ferromagnetic state in Eu 0.6 La 0.4 À x Sr x MnO 3 , and thus increase the intensity of EPR signals due to Griffiths phase signals over a wide temperature region. The transition temperature to ferromagnetic phase is difficult to determine as the ferromagnetic lines are presumably masked by the predominant lines due to Griffiths phase, but by extrapolation it appears to be about 125 K (see Fig.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 87%
“…As a result, in real samples, the transition into magnetically ordered phase is often broadened and characterized by a coexistence of high-temperature (paramagnetic) and lowtemperature magnetically ordered phases over a wide temperature range. The persistence of paramagnetic phase down to the lowest temperatures was experimentally confirmed for various compositions of doped manganites, in particular, for those for which the ground state is ferromagnetic [2,34,41,42,46]. In our case, it is expected that the residual paramagnetic phase is mainly located within the intergrain region.…”
Section: Electron-spin Resonance Studysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The PM signal is also slightly shifted to smaller fields, and at temperatures of about 260 K it starts to distort (Fig. 5), as is often observed in doped manganites [27,41,42]. It is noteworthy that the presence of paramagnetic phase below the point of the nucleation of magnetically ordered phase is not unexpected phenomenon for the doped manganite samples.…”
Section: Electron-spin Resonance Studymentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation