2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.13424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase separation intJladders

Abstract: The phase separation boundary of isotropic t-J ladders is analyzed using density matrix renormalization group techniques. The complete boundary to phase separation as a function of J/t and doping is determined for a chain and for ladders with two, three and four legs. Six-chain ladders have been analyzed at low hole doping. We use a direct approach in which the phase separation boundary is determined by measuring the hole density in the part of the system which contains both electrons and holes. In addition we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that this limit is negative, and therefore phase separation must occur, for t/J(= t ⊥ /J ⊥ ) anywhere below a value about 0.5, independent of J/J ⊥ -although due to numerical uncertainty, this estimate cannot be made very precise. This is in good agreement with previous estimates: Rommer et al 21 , for instance, find the phase separation boundary at half-filling to lie at J/t = 2.156(2), or t/J = 0.464, from a density matrix renormalization group calculation for the isotropic ladder.…”
Section: Among the Nine Eigenstates For The Unperturbedsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that this limit is negative, and therefore phase separation must occur, for t/J(= t ⊥ /J ⊥ ) anywhere below a value about 0.5, independent of J/J ⊥ -although due to numerical uncertainty, this estimate cannot be made very precise. This is in good agreement with previous estimates: Rommer et al 21 , for instance, find the phase separation boundary at half-filling to lie at J/t = 2.156(2), or t/J = 0.464, from a density matrix renormalization group calculation for the isotropic ladder.…”
Section: Among the Nine Eigenstates For The Unperturbedsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The basic properties of the t − J ladder have been explored by exact diagonalizations 11,12,13,14,15,16,17 , the density renormalization group 18,19,20,21 , quantum Monte Carlo simulation 22 , and series expansion techniques 23,24 , as well as approximate analytic theories 19,20,25,26,27,28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the lowest energy two-hole state is not amenable to our series approach; but the DMRG calculations show that two holes become strongly bound at larger t/t ⊥ . This raises the question of whether phase separation will occur in this region, as it does in the t − J ladder [23]. This question must await future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many authors [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] have addressed the question of PS in the t − J model. It is well accepted that for J ≫ t, holes tend to cluster together leaving the rest of the system in an antiferromagnetic state without holes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%