2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.267210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Separation in Jahn-Teller Systems with Localized and Itinerant Electrons

Abstract: The phase diagram for doped manganites and related compounds is analyzed in terms of the Kondo-lattice model taking into account an interplay between electrons localized due to lattice distortions and those in the band states. It is shown that the number of itinerant charge carriers can be significantly lower than that implied by the doping level. The competition between the homogeneous (ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic) and phase-separated states is discussed and a strong tendency to the phase separation wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
91
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hamiltonian of the model takes into account the essential physics of strongly correlated electron systems with the Jahn-Teller ions: it is, in fact, the Hubbard model with the strong electron-lattice interaction, the Hund's rule intraatomic coupling, and AF interatomic exchange between local spins. Such an approach provides a possibility to understand the difference between the number of itinerant charge carriers n b and the doping level 22 . It is shown that n b can be significantly lower than the number of the charge carriers implied by the doping level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Hamiltonian of the model takes into account the essential physics of strongly correlated electron systems with the Jahn-Teller ions: it is, in fact, the Hubbard model with the strong electron-lattice interaction, the Hund's rule intraatomic coupling, and AF interatomic exchange between local spins. Such an approach provides a possibility to understand the difference between the number of itinerant charge carriers n b and the doping level 22 . It is shown that n b can be significantly lower than the number of the charge carriers implied by the doping level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hamiltonian H el is similar to that considered in Ref. 22 and the temperature T enters only the effective hopping integralt(T ). To calculate the free energy of the electronic subsystem, we use the Hubbard I decoupling for the one-b-electron Green function G b (n, n 0 ; τ − τ 0 ) = −i T c n (τ )c † n0 (τ 0 ) , as in Ref.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Avoiding phenomenological arguments, we discuss the phase separation within the framework of a modified Falicov-Kimball model, with an infinite interaction constant between 'a hydrogen hole' and an s-electron on the hydrogen atom. The advantage of such an approach is its generality: the phase separation is a known property of a ground state of Falicov-Kimball-like models [12][13][14][15][16] robust against variation of microscopic details. To estimate the characteristic energies of the phase-separated state, we apply the Hubbard-I approximation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Т. е. в результате размещения магнитных примесей в двух, вообще говоря, локально подобных позициях происходит пространственное расщепление электронно-го спектра, и арсенид кадмия приобретает свойства вей-левского металла. В то же время чередование областей с различными типами (АФМ и ФМ) взаимодействий указывает на то, что имеет место сценарий мелкомас-штабного фазового расслоения [30], используемый для объяснения отрицательного колоссального магнетосо-противления.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified