2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-resolved real-time ocean wave prediction with quantified uncertainty based on variational Bayesian machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ref. [79], the wave energy is predicted using Bayesian machine learning. The prediction error of this machine for short-term wave prediction is up to 55.4%, which is 11.7% less than linear wave theory and certain machine learning methods.…”
Section: Tidal Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [79], the wave energy is predicted using Bayesian machine learning. The prediction error of this machine for short-term wave prediction is up to 55.4%, which is 11.7% less than linear wave theory and certain machine learning methods.…”
Section: Tidal Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to the flow over solid surfaces, the applications of ML approaches to air-sea interactions have been quite limited and mainly focused on predicting wave characteristics (e.g. O'Donncha et al 2018O'Donncha et al , 2019Rasp & Lerch 2018;Sun et al 2022;Zhang et al 2022;Dakar et al 2023;Lou et al 2023;Xu, Zhang & Shi 2023). The existing works have employed different ML frameworks to reduce the computational complexity in estimating statistical wave conditions, such as significant wave height and peak wave period, and in low-dimensional learning of wave propagation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research, limited efforts have been made to reconstruct the turbulent flow above/below surface waves based only on wave observations (e.g. Smeltzer et al 2019;Gakhar, Koseff & Ouellette 2020;Xuan & Shen 2023;Zhang et al 2023). Using convolutional neural network (CNN) classifiers, Gakhar et al (2020) demonstrated that surface elevation information alone can be used to determine the physical features at the bottom boundary (see also Mandel et al 2017;Gakhar, Koseff & Ouellette 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of accurate physics-based sea-surface drag models [40,41], machine learning (ML) approaches may offer a practical alternative. Nonetheless, despite various applications of ML methods in the field of fluid mechanics and turbulence research [42][43][44][45], their utilization in air-sea interaction studies has been predominantly focused on estimating statistical wave characteristics such as significant wave height and peak wave period [46][47][48][49][50][51]. Yet, the feasibility of using ML techniques to reconstruct the turbulent flow over/below surface waves requires to be explored in more detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%