2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase resolved near-field imaging of propagating waves in infrared tapered slot antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(c) and 3(e)], but some of this difference and the large changes in phase can be attributed to the minimal amount of field in this area, which has been shown to yield relatively large error in phase. 19 Another difference between the simulations and experimental data shown is the lack of amplitude signal from the microbolometric element and the lead lines in the simulation as compared to the experiment where a relatively strong amplitude signal is present at these structures [ Figs. 3(b) and 3(d)].…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3(c) and 3(e)], but some of this difference and the large changes in phase can be attributed to the minimal amount of field in this area, which has been shown to yield relatively large error in phase. 19 Another difference between the simulations and experimental data shown is the lack of amplitude signal from the microbolometric element and the lead lines in the simulation as compared to the experiment where a relatively strong amplitude signal is present at these structures [ Figs. 3(b) and 3(d)].…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previously, antennas not coupled to a load, as well as antennas coupled to transmissions lines have been investigated with this technique. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] However, to the best of our knowledge, the spatial near-field distribution of nanoantennas coupled to bolometers has not yet been explored and/or such insight used for device optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences in the simulated and measured near-field phase can be attributed to the diminished field on the less resonant elements compared to the more resonant element, which increase errors in the phase data as has been seen previously. 36 In contrast, the phase in proximity to the more resonant element where there is stronger field shows much greater consistency between the simulations and experimental data. In Figs.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 78%