2010 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/freq.2010.5556176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase noise in the photodetection of ultrashort optical pulses

Abstract: Femtosecond laser frequency combs provide an effective and efficient way to take an ultra-stable optical frequency reference and divide the signal down into the microwave region. In order to convert optical pulses into a usable RF signal, one must use high-speed photodetection; unfortunately, excess phase noise from both technical and fundamental sources can arise in the photodetection process. In order to ultimately minimize the noise effects of the photodetector, we must first characterize some of the known … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The desired microwave frequency, 10 GHz in our case, is electrically filtered and used as a frequency source. With illumination as just described, we obtain maximum 10 GHz signal powers near saturation of approximately -25 dBm at 1 mA for PD1, -13 dBm at 5 mA for PD2 and -6 dBm at 6 mA for PD3 [18]. Increasing the photocurrent above these values results in minimal increase of the achievable 10 GHz power, or even a decrease in some cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The desired microwave frequency, 10 GHz in our case, is electrically filtered and used as a frequency source. With illumination as just described, we obtain maximum 10 GHz signal powers near saturation of approximately -25 dBm at 1 mA for PD1, -13 dBm at 5 mA for PD2 and -6 dBm at 6 mA for PD3 [18]. Increasing the photocurrent above these values results in minimal increase of the achievable 10 GHz power, or even a decrease in some cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…From Figure 4, the "worst case" AM-to-PM values for PD1 and PD2 are 2.3 rad and 0.6 rad, respectively, at 4 mA. Using these values and the RIN of Figure 9a, we calculated the anticipated phase noise (Figure 9b) [18].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This timing jitter level is well below the sensitivity of the traditional microwave method, which is based on direct, high-speed detection of the pulse trains and subsequent amplification and frequency mixing of a harmonic of the detected repetition rates to baseband for spectral noise analysis. Even if careful attention is paid to the design of the photodetector and the subsequent mixing processes, this method suffers from nonlinearityinduced phase noise, limiting its sensitivity typically to a few femtoseconds integrated jitter [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most situations, distortions caused by PD are not under consideration since the PD shows un-conspicuous nonlinearity in the non-saturated linear range. However, PD is easy to get saturated and causes nonlinearity when the incident beam is a pulsed light source because the peak power of the pulsed light source is much higher than that of the CW light source under the same average optical power [12]. It has been demonstrated that the phase of the directly detected electrical signal changes as a function of the applied optical energy for the un-modulated optical pulse trains due to the PD saturation effect [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%