OFC '98. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest. Conference Edition. 1998 OSA Technical Digest Se
DOI: 10.1109/ofc.1998.657382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-noise characterization of optoelectronic components by carrier suppression techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement of these 1 / f fluctuations is a challenging problem and has been reported previously only in a single instance. 30 A second source of noise is the EOM. While the physical structure makes one think that these components are less noisy than the active devices, no information has been found about their noise.…”
Section: Other Sources Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of these 1 / f fluctuations is a challenging problem and has been reported previously only in a single instance. 30 A second source of noise is the EOM. While the physical structure makes one think that these components are less noisy than the active devices, no information has been found about their noise.…”
Section: Other Sources Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many high performance systems such as those mentioned above could be limited by the close-in noise of the photodetector. Yet the lack of information regarding this topic-only one conference article [SYML98] is found in the literature-made this work necessary. In this paper we describe a sensitive measurement technique for the close-in phase noise and amplitude noise, and the measurement of several photodetectors used to detect microwave (10 GHz) sidebands of optical carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1/f noise of the microwave photodetector is expected to be similar to that of an amplifier because the underlying physics and technology are similar. The measurement is a challenging experimental problem, which has been tackled only at the JPL independently by Rubiola and Shieh [33,32,27]. The results agree in that at 10 GHz the typical b −1 of a InGaAs p-i-n photodetector is of 10 −12 rad 2 /Hz (−120 dBrad 2 /Hz).…”
Section: Flicker Noisementioning
confidence: 86%